Stop the "Money Pit" Campaign Launched to Abolish Redevelopment Agencies

There are some 425 redevelopment agencies (RDA) in California, located in almost every city and community. These relatively unknown agencies use their power of eminent domain to forcibly seize places of worship, small businesses and homes only to give them to politically connected developers on the cheap. In turn, they use your tax dollars to underwrite development projects.

This could change now that a group of conservative activists and private property rights advocates have launched www.StoptheMoneyPit.com, a statewide public education campaign intended to get Republicans to renew their conservative values by signing a pledge to permanently abolish RDAs.

Visit www.StoptheMoneyPit.com to help build public support to abolish "the Money Pit."

Chula Vista City-Subsidized Building Facing Foreclosure

6.23.11 – The City of Chula Vista faces negative financial repercussions as a city-subsidized building faces foreclosure. Despite scaling back on city services, Chula Vista instead paid a developer some $2.2 million in RDA funds for the the building in foreclosure, hoping to recoup those subsidies in property tax revenue at the site. Just another example of how redevelopment agencies drain vital city funds! Read more here.

Veteran Newsman Ron Kaye Weighs in On Redevelopment

6.23.11 – Full Disclosure features veteran newsman Ron Kaye who exposes the Los Angeles Community Development Agency as being "plagued with cronyism and corruption." Watch here.

Kelo Decision Anniversary Timely as RDAs Hang in Limbo

6.23.11 – Six years ago today, the U.S. Supreme Court, Kelo v. New London, ruled that government can forcibly seize homes, businesses and places of worship by eminent domain. Sadly, California is among the biggest abusers of eminent domain in the Nation. This in large part due to California's 425 redevelopment agencies. Help abolish redevelopment agencies by visiting www.StopTheMoneyPit.com 

Greenhut Editorial: New Caltrans slumlord scandal

6.22.11 - Columnist Steven Greenhut exposes Caltrans failure after seizing property and homes through eminent domain to build roads and freeways, and in turn created blight and despair. He says, "It was about how Caltrans kept properties off the tax rolls, draining county coffers of tens of millions of dollars in lost revenue. It was a about abuse of power." Read editorial here.

Assemblywoman Beth Gaines Urges Elimination of RDAs

6.21.11 - The FlashReport featured an opinion piece on the elimination of RDAs by Assemblywoman Beth Gaines in which she says, "unfortunately today, many use these state-subsidized programs to seize private property through eminent domain, incur enormous amounts of debt and supplement other general fund expenditures - with little accountability to taxpayers." Read article here.

Opinion: Republicans should favor abolishing redevelopment agencies

6.20.11 - Alliance President urges Republicans to "redeem themselves for RDAs have not been 'permanently' abolished," and support SB 77 and AB 101, which would permanently eliminate these abusive entities. Read op-ed here.

49ner Stadium Budget Includes City Council Pay Raise

6.20.11 - The City of San Jose reveals that included in the budget to build the 49ners stadium project, was "a 10 percent pay raise for themselves." Yes, your tax dollars will fund this stadium AND line the pockets of the City Council! To read more on this outrageous pay raise, click here.

Governor Brown's Original Proposal Still Finding Support

6.19.11 - The Santa Cruz Sentinel discusses the value of Governor Brown's original budget proposal which included the elimination of redevelopment agencies to divert those funds to schools and public safety. Read article here.

Redevelopment Agencies Anxiously Await Fate

6.19.11 - Despite Governor Brown vetoing the budget Democrats passed, redevelopment agencies continue to hang in the balance as two bills "that would eliminate some 400 development agencies and allow creation of new agencies were passed but not transmitted to the governor." Read more on RDAs being left in limbo by clicking here.

Steven Greenhut: Redevelopment agencies on the brink

6.17.11 - Columnist Steven Greenhut weighs in on the fate of redevelopment agencies now that "redevelopment is on the ropes." He goes on to say, "That is reason to celebrate." Read Greenhut's opinion piece here.

CA Legislature Abolishes Redevelopment Agencies...For Now

6.16.11 - With the support of mostly Democrats and six Republicans, the state legislature voted to abolish redevelopment agencies, with a catch. The San Jose Mercury News reports, "Agencies that agree to divert a certain amount of the property tax they collect to schools, fire protection districts and transit districts can continue to exist as agencies." Read more here!

Institute for Justice Calls for Abolishment of RDAs, Support of SB 77

6.15.11 - The Institute for Justice (IJ) released legislative analysis concluding that the only way to protect Californians from the constant threat of eminent domain is to support legislation that abolishes California's 425 redevelopment agencies, SB 77. Read analysis here.

Congressman McClintock Calls for End to Redevelopment Agencies

6.14.11 - Joining a growing base of private property rights groups, taxpayers and faith based organizations, conservative stalwart Congressman Tom McClintock is calling for an end to California's 425 redevelopment agencies! In a YouTube video, the Congressman calls out RDAs for abusing private property rights and wasteful government spending. Watch video here!

Defenders of "Religious Rights" Support Bills to Abolish RDAs

6.10.11 - In response to legislation that would abolish RDAs, Tina Ramirez with the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, penned the following in the OC Register, "This move would likely create benefits for religious freedom by eliminating government agencies that have no interest in preserving 'uneconomical' land uses like churches and synagogues." To read more, click here.

Alternative Reform Bills Fail to Cure Fundamental RDA Flaws

6.10.11 - A Riverside Press-Enterprise Editorial says the following of so–called redevelopment reform legislation, "Giving local governments a free hand to play with tax money at great public cost, but with little need to answer to taxpayers, invites trouble. Such dubious "reforms" will not make redevelopment better, or provide any reason for the state to preserve it." Read more here.

Press Release: Family Action PAC urges Orange County GOP Legislators to Abandon Defense of Redevelopment Agencies

6.9.11 - Today, the California Alliance to Protect Private Property Rights announced that a prominent conservative Orange County political action committee has joined a coalition of taxpayer and private property rights organizations in calling for the abolition of California redevelopment agencies (RDA). Read press release here!

Voters Recall Hercules Mayor, Council Member

6.9.11 - Hercules voters overwhelmingly approved the recall of their mayor and a City council member in a special election this past week. Hopefully this will serve as a lesson to other City officials abusing redevelopment funds and engaging in sweetheart deals with developers that this bad behavior is unacceptable to taxpaying citizens! To read more, click here.

Arguments for Saving RDAs Lose Steam in San Jose

6.8.11 - With little to show for the redevelopment dollars spent, the City of San Jose struggles to illustrate how saving RDAs is valuable to the city and its residents. Read more here.

Hercules Holding Recall in Response to RDA Scheme

6.7.11 - Redevelopment allowed the City of Hercules Mayor and a City Council Member to practice crony capitalism at the expense of taxpayers. Now, the fate of both elected officials rests in the hands of voters who will decide whether or not to recall them by way of special election. Read more here!

CATO Institute Report: Tax-Increment Financing = Crony Capitalism

6.6.11 - Tax-increment financing is a clever way for cities to redirect crucial tax revenue generated by new development away from schools, libraries, and other urban services only to subsidize those same developments! The CATO Institute report indicates that this shifting of funds does nothing to benefit a city or the taxpaying citizens who reside there. Click here to read the report.

Steven Greenhut: Proving the Redevelopment Rule

6.3.11 - In a pointed rebuttal to Glendora Mayor Doug Tressitor's recent articles defending the importance of redevelopment agencies, columnist Steven Greenhut dismantles the unexceptional and all too common arguments made by Mayor Tressitor and CA Republicans who defend redevelopment. Read Greenhut piece here.

City of Colton Pours RDA Dollars Into General Fund

6.1.11 - A Riverside Press Enterprise article illustrates how common it is for local government to use redevelopment funds as a slush fund for general city expenses! Read more here.

1998 Study on RDAs Still Relevant Today

6.1.11 - Does vacant land equal blight? A 1998, Public Policy Institute of California (PPC) report on redevelopment's use of tax increment financing found that in 20 of 114 sample RDA projects, over 50% of project land was vacant land. Unfortunately times have not changed and some RDAs still seem to be more engaged in development versus redevelopment! To read more, click here.

Press Release: Conservative Leaders and Property Rights Advocates call on GOP Legislators to Abandon Defense of Redevelopment Agencies

5.24.11 - Today, conservative leaders and private property rights advocates announced a statewide public education campaign to convince Republican State Legislators to abolish California Redevelopment Agencies (RDAs) to advance the conservative values of property rights and fiscal responsibility. Click here for full press release!

City of Salinas Pushes to Expand Redevelopment Area

5.24.11 - In a move that is raising the eyebrows of residents and property rights advocates, the City of Salinas is pushing to expand their redevelopment area from six percent of city area to almost a third. This plan would put a great deal of land and homes in threat of eminent domain down the road. To read more, click here.

Garden Grove Small Business Owners Asked to Move for Proposed Hotel

5.24.11 - The City of Garden Grove is asking a popular ice cream shop, along with three other small businesses and several residents of Harbor Boulevard to relocate so a proposed 700-room hotel can take their place. If these property owners do not move, they face the threat of eminent domain! Read OC Register article here.

Republican Legislators Urged to Abandon Support for RDAs

5.24.11 – Conservative blogger calls on Republicans to "seize the moment" by abandoning support for redevelopment agencies, bastions of eminent domain abuse and wasteful government spending. Read More.

Who Opposes SB 77 and How Much Will They Pay to Defeat It?

5.12.10 – Are campaign contributions influencing State Legislators to vote against SB 77, a bill that will abolish redevelopment agencies? You be the judge by clicking here.

Will Assembly Republicans Reconsider Stance on Redevelopment?

5.14.11 –The Sacramento Bee reports that Republicans have introduced a budget and "Assembly Republicans are relying on a redevelopment overhaul for $1 billion to $1.7 billion in revenues. Because of differing opinions in the caucus, the plan does not spell out whether to fully eliminate redevelopment, as Brown has proposed, or whether to take a smaller payment but keep the program intact, as the agencies have suggested."  Read More. 

City of Banning to Exercise Eminent Domain

5.14.11 – The City of Banning ruled in favor of exercising eminent domain to acquire a vacant piece of property for a planned development across from city hall. Blight designations have apparently become so broad, that even dirt can be considered blight! Can't believe it? Read more here! 

Republican Senator Huff Accused of Conflict of Interest

5.10.11 – The Los Angeles Times reports that Republican Senator Bob Huff who is leading the charge to save redevelopment agencies from the budget ax may have a financial conflict of interest. His wife works for Majestic Realty, one of the largest developers of redevelopment projects. By the way, this same firm was a major contributor against eminent domain ballot measures! Think again if you believe Republicans are the champions of private property rights. Read More. 

National City Decision Could be Catalyst for RDA Reform

5.10.11 – Referencing the National City eminent domain legal ruling in favor of a youth boxing center, the Contra Costa Times writes, “The decision, we trust, will make it more difficult for redevelopment agencies to unfairly take private property without first establishing that it is truly blighted.” Property rights advocates can only hope this is so!   Read more here.

Will SB 286 Cause Real Redevelopment Agency Reform?

5.9.11 - The Lake County News reports that Senator Wright has introduced a bill that purports to reform redevelopment agencies. But can it be real reform if these perpetrators of eminent domain abuse support the bill? Read more.

New Assembly Member Gaines -- Last Republican Vote to End RDAs?

5.9.11 - This week Beth Gaines is being sworn in as a new Legislator. Will Gaines provide the one Republican vote needed to abolish RDAs? The Sacramento Bee hopes so saying, "We hope she supplies a needed vote in support of Gov. Jerry Brown's proposal to abolish and reform redevelopment; the plan stalled one vote short of passage." Read more here.

Temple City Closes Door on RDA Corruption Case

5.4.11 – Temple City shuts the door on largest public corruption case in the city’s history but reinforces a growing mistrust in redevelopment agencies across the state.  City officials were accused of accepting bribes from a developer shortly after threatening to take property slated for redevelopment through eminent domain.  Read more about this classic case of redevelopment corruption here!

Legislative Counsel Says Brown's Redevelopment Plan is Illegal

5.4.11 - The Legislature's lawyers said in a recent memo that part of Gov. Jerry Brown's plan to eliminate redevelopment agencies is unconstitutional because the state cannot reimburse itself with local property taxes. Read Capitol Alert here.

Dan Walters: San Diego case hits right note on redevelopment

5.2.11 - Walters writes, "The National City decision offers a cogent example of why redevelopment should either be abolished, as Brown proposes, or redirected toward cleaning up real blight, not the imaginary kind." Read more here!

The Wall Street Journal: Property Rights Knockout

5.2.11 - Highlighting the recent ruling in the National City eminent domain case, The Wall Street Journal reinforces the point that "California has been a leading abuser of eminent domain and the case should resonate with California Republican lawmakers." Read article here.

National City Should Lose Eminent Domain Authority

4.29.11 - On the heels of a significant and rare ruling in the National City eminent domain battle, private property rights advocates point to this case as a "poster child" for how loose 'blight' designations have become allowing cities to attempt to take land through eminent domain. Read full op-ed for more details here.

Senator Wolk Bill SB 214 Moves Forward

4.29.11 - The Contra Costa Times reports that Wolks bill, SB 214 has passed through the Senate Governance and Finance Committee. SB 214 is a creative alternative to relying on redevelopment agencies to create economic development in cities. Read more about SB 214 here.

Donald Trump - Eminent Domain Friend or Foe?

4.23.11 - Where does real estate mogul and possible presidential candidate Donald Trump stand on eminent domain? Find out here.

Colusa Approves Redevelopment Plan

4.22.11 - Despite many protests, including the Alliance's very own board member Ashley Indrieri, of the Family Water Alliance, Colusa officials finalized redevelopment plans for the City. "It can be created without a vote of the citizens affected," Ashley Indrieri warned in the article, "And unlike other governments, it can incur bond indebtedness without voter approval." Read more here.

San Diego Youth Center Wins Eminent Domain Battle

4.22.11 - The Sacramento Bee reports in a rare occurrence of private property rights being upheld, a San Diego judge ruled in favor of a youth community center which was slated to be taken by eminent domain and used to build a 24-story, mixed use condominium project. Read more about this property rights victory here! Watch a video here!

Steven Greenhut: Redevelopment Blights the Golden State

4.22.11 - Read Steven Greenhut's new article on how redevelopment affects the state of California and why our legislature needs to shut these agencies down once and for all. Click here for Greenhut article.

End or Mend Redevelopment Agencies?

4.20.11 - Falling short of just one Republican Assembly vote, advocates and opponents of RDAs keep the argument alive as to whether the state should mend or end local redevelopment agencies. The Sacramento Bee ran an article that gives light to both sides of the argument. Read more here.

Wall Street Journal - Blight Cures Drain City Coffers

4.9.11 – The Wall Street Journal writes "Redevelopment distrust in California, designed to harness private property enterprise to revive blighted neighborhoods, are increasingly putting a financial strain on local governments…" Click here to read more!

Assemblyman Chris Norby Joins Alliance Board of Directors

4.13.11 - The California Alliance to Protect Private Property Rights is pleased to announce Assemblyman Chris Norby has joined our Board of Directors. A longtime champion of private property rights, Mr. Norby will be a knowledgable and passionate addition to our board. Click here to read his bio.

Cases of RDA Abuse Continue to Come to Light

4.11.11 - In a recent article, The Riverside Press-Enterprise asks the question, "So is helping new restaurants really a higher civic priority for tax money than public safety, parks or other city services?" A question all cities should be asking as crucial public funds are cut and redevelopment abuse continues to push forward. Read article here.

Judge Denies State Request to Drill on Private Property

4.11.11 - The Fresno Bee reports a judge in San Joaquin County denied a state request to drill into the private property of 25-30 land owners "in search of the best route for a peripheral canal." For two years 150 delta landowners have been fighting the state over allowing drilling on their property. Read more on this heated land battle here! To read Stockton Record Net's editorial on the water war, click here.

Institute for Justice VP Urges Republicans to Dissolve RDAs

4.9.11 - In a Riverside Press Enterprise Op-Ed, Institute for Justice Vice President John E. Kramer says, "Republicans have an opportunity to demonstrate their own leadership in pursuit of individual rights by dissolving a form of government that has for decades abused its powers." Click here full op-ed!

Azusa Furniture Store Owner Loses Property Battle With the City

4.5.11 - The San Gabriel Valley Tribune reports that after a 2 year battle with the City of Azusa, furniture store owner Roy Fowler sold his property to the city, after being threatened by use of eminent domain. Read more about this gross example of abuse against one small business owner by clicking here.

Glendale Land Dispute Settled for $16M

4.5.11 - The Glendale News Press reports that developer Rick Caruso purchased the Golden Key Hotel for $16M, 10 million more than his original $6M offer. What began as a looming eminent domain case, ended with a fair settlement to hotel owner Ray Patel. Read more here.

Dan Walters: Redevelopment Officials Are Offering a Pig in a Poke

4.4.11 - Sacramento Bee columnist Dan Walters explains how in an effort to remain afloat, RDAs offered to "voluntarily shift some funds into schools in return for being allowed to extend redevelopment projects that are expiring." Walters calls this nothing more than "a bribe to the state to allow the extension of marginal projects." Read column here.

High Speed Rail Plan Continues to Lose Support

4.3.11 - The California High Speed Rail project continues to lose support from influential agencies and California residents as costs rise and adverse effects, such as the threat of eminent domain, become a reality. Read more on this "budgetary black hole" here!

Future of RDAs Sits in Assembly Republican Hands

3.31.11 - With time still on the clock for Assembly Republicans to regain their party platform as proponents of private property rights by placing ONE vote to eliminate RDAs, advocates everywhere urge them to "not let RDAs off the hook!" Click here to read more.

Institute for Justice Calls on CA Republicans to Eliminate RDAs

3.31.11 - The Institute for Justice sent out a press release today calling on California Republicans to approve a proposal to elminiate 400 redevelopment agencies across the state. The Institute for Justice is the nation's leading legal agency against eminent domain abuse. Read press release here.

Hope for Assembly Republican Support of RDA Elimination Remains

3.22.11 - Referred to as a "major disappointment" in the battle to eliminate redevelopment agencies by way of Gov. Jerry Brown's proposal, CA Assembly Rebublicans still have time to stand up for private property rights -- a stance that was once a major leg of the Republican Party Platform. Read Orange County Register editorial here.

GOP Under Fire For Voting to Save RDAs

3.21.11 - In a follow up piece to Steven Greenhut's stinging criticism of GOP members move to save redevelopment agencies last week, one Reason Magazine writer echoes similar criticisms in how Republicans have missed the mark once again with their recent vote. Read more here.

National City Eminent Domain Battle Goes to Court

3.21.11 - Among 700 properties that stand to be designated as blighted, one local boxing gym continues to fight for it's right to remain untouched. Watch the Institute for Justice video of the private property battle currently taking place in National City.

Greenhut: CA GOP Saves Eminent Domain!

3.18.11 - "Given the opportunity to rein in the size and power of government in a tangible way, Assembly Republicans with one sole exception punted. They rallied to save some of the most abusive and wastrel government agencies around." writes Steven Greenhut in a Cal Watchdog piece. Despite claims of opposing eminent domain in the past, the GOP faltered from this stance in last week's vote on Gov. Brown's proposal to elminate RDAs. Read more here!

Cuts at Forefront of Budget Discussion

3.17.11 - Read Capitol Weekly article on how GOP Leader defends redevelopment agencies! How can the Party of private property rights defend agencies that steal private property by eminent domain? Click here for full article!

Op-Ed: Is Smart Growth Really Smart?

3.15.11 - "Is smart growth really a vehicle for big business to use the passion of environmentalists and the power of local government to seize valuable, scarce private property that is owned by someone else?" asks Donna Holt in her sharp critique of "smart growth" across California. To read op-ed, click here.

Is Redevelopment Anything More Than a Political Hoax?

3.15.11 - Thomas Sowell writes that redevelopment "involves taking decisions out of the hands of the population at large and putting the power to make those decisions in the hands of elites." Begging the question, "Why are so many people who are opposed to development nevertheless in favor of "redevelopment?" Read more here.

Redding RDA Takes Step Towards Using Eminent Domain

3.15.11 - Along with approving the placement of the long contended Churn Creek Road extension back in the planning docket, Redding's RDA also moved to seize two properties by eminent domain to build a new courthouse. The Churn Creek Road is expected ruin tree-lined streets, destroy wetlands and cost the city millions of dollars. Read full article here.

Boxing Gym for Kids Fights Blight Designation

3.14.11 - Despite years of giving kids a place to workout, study and stay off the streets, the Community Youth Center in National City was deemed blighted in 2007. The small boxing gym is fighting back, urging the city to remove the blight designation. Read more here. Watch video coverage here.

California Cities Rally for Redevelopment

3.12.11 - According to statements in the Redding Searchlight, redevelopment interests plan on spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on a public relations campaign to protect their power to seize private property by eminent domain. If they can spend this kind of money, local government budgets they can't be that starved for cash! Read More.

RDAs Shift Funds to City Coffers as a Budget Vote Looms

3.11.11 - California cities rush to shift redevelopment funds and properties into city coffers as Gov. Brown's budget proposal heads towards a vote by the legislature. Read Sac Bee article here!

State Controller Finds Major Flaws in CA Redevelopment Agencies

3.7.11 - CA State Controller John Chiang's audit of 18 California redevelopment agencies was released today revealing major "reporting flaws, substandard audits, questionable payment practices and an inappropriate use of affordable housing funds." Read more by clicking on the following news articles;

Sacramento Bee - "Controller bashes redevelopment agencies"

Los Angeles Times - "Redevelopment agencies shortchanged California schools $40 million, controller's review finds"

California's Capitol - "A Tidbit from the Controller's Redevelopment Agency Audit"

Counties Support Proposal to Run State Programs

3.7.11 - The Sacramento Bee reports that the California League of Counties is rallying behind the Governor's proposal to shift various state programs to counties with one exception, funding issues must be resolved first. Read more here.

RDA Advocates Launch Ad Campaign as Last Ditch Effort

3.7.11 - In a final effort to protect redevelopment agencies from being abolished, cities have launched a statewide "ad blitz and signature-gathering campaign" urging legislators not to vote for Gov. Brown's proposal to eliminate all 400 California RDAs. Read LA Times article.

One City Forsees What Life Will Look Like Without Redevelopment

3.7.11 - "The end of redevelopment and it's looking likely the Legislature will sign off on it will be a nasty mess with the climax likely to play out in a courtroom rather than an empty office building." states a Voice of San Diego article in response to the upcoming vote on Gov. Brown's proposal to end RDAs. Read more on what one city expects will happen if redevelopment becomes an agency of the past by clicking here!

San Diego Mayor and Chargers Explore Other Financing Options for Stadium

3.7.11 - In the event RDAs are eliminated, San Diego Mayor and Chargers President discuss other financing options for a new stadium. "The Chargers have been counting on covering most of the $800 million cost of the stadium with the use of redevelopment funding," writes one reporter from San Diego Sign On. Yet another example of how RDA funding continues to be used for expensive developments rather than eliminating blight! Read more here.

Is Push to Eliminate RDAs Losing Steam?

3.5.11 - With support mounting from Democrats and Republicans standing strong against the elimination of RDAs, Gov. Brown's proposal to end redevelopment agencies may be losing momentum as a vote by the legislature looms near. Read Orange County Register opinion piece here.

Gov. Brown's Proposal Goes to Floor for Votes This Week

3.4.11 - The Sacramento Bee reports that Gov. Brown's budget proposal including the elimination of RDAs, cleared the budget conference committee and will be heard by the Assembly and Senate on the floor this week. Read Sac Bee article for more details.

Viewpoints: RDAs stomped on the little people for too long

3.3.11 - In the Sacramento Bee, lawyer Robert P. Silverstein delivers a punishing op-ed highlighting the abuse and inadequacies of redevelopment agencies. "For years, redevelopment agencies have abused the power of eminent domain to grind down the little people. Now Brown may crush the agencies, liberating us in the process." Read more here!

Oakland Stands to Lose Major Redevelopment Projects

3.3.11 - Since 1965, the City of Oakland has deemed nearly half of it's land as redevelopment zones. In turn, as Gov. Brown's proposal to eliminate RDAs continues to take shape, Oakland stands to lose major funding to projects, city staff salaries and more. Read Oakland Tribune article.

Glendale Land Deal Leaves RDA Opponents Unsatisfied

3.2.11 - "He wasn't in it for the money, or was he? Did he use the masses, including myself, to justify his means? I guess the sad answer is: Yes, he did." writes one longtime RDA opponent about his efforts in helping Mr. Patel fight for his property. What appeared to be a happy ending in the Glendale land dispute leaves a bad taste in one property rights advocate's mouth. Read City Watch article.

Glendale Case is "Poster Child" for Abolishing RDAs

3.2.11 - Despite a recent settlement between developer Rick Caruso and Golden Key Hotel hotel owner Ray Patel in Glendale, opponents of RDAs point to this case as an example why redevelopment agencies should be eliminated. Read more here!

San Diego Approves $4 Billion in RDA Spending

2.28.11 - The San Diego Tribune reports the San Diego City Council approved $4 billion in redevelopment projects in "possibly the largest defensive move by a California city against proposed state elimination of redevelopment agencies." Gov. Brown's office took notice of this move but was left unrattled as one legislative committee has already approved his plan. Read more here.

Cities Under Increasing Scrutiny for Using RDA Funds on City Services

2.28.11 - The San Jose Redevelopment Agency is in the hot seat for using RDA funds to pay salaries of city and elected officials rather than the intended use to "eliminate blight and promote economic activity." Unbelievable? Certainly - but this abuse happens far more often than not, as Californians are coming to realize. Read article here.

Logic "On Holiday" When it Comes to Redevelopment Argument

2.27.11 - In the recent article Santa Clara Mayor complained about the possible loss of $40 million to fund building a new San Francisco 49ers stadium at the cost of redevelopment funds going back to local government and schools. It is hard to logically argue the necessity of a new stadium versus funding cash strapped schools! Read Daily Democrat article.

Mending Vs. Ending Redevelopment Agencies

2.27.11 - The SF Gate offers a piece arguing rather than abolish RDAs, government should tighten rules and oversight to ensure the proper use of public funds for redevelopment. Read more here.

The Forgotten Victims of Redevelopment Abuse

2.27.11 - In response to an article defending RDAs in the OC Register, an Orange Juice blog redirects the light to victims of redevelopment abuse often forgotten in the current debate - the families and businesses displaced by use of eminent domain. Read blog here.

Cities Break From United Front in Fight Against RDA Abolition

2.27.11 - What started as a "seemingly unanimous chorus" among California city leaders in opposition to Gov. Brown's proposal to eliminate RDAs, has turned into an increasingly cracked front as San Bernadino officials suggest only certain RDAS should be abolished, while others should stay. Click here to read Redlands Daily Facts article.

Redevelopment Agencies: A Necessity of the Past?

2.27.11 - Opponents of eliminating RDAs lose steam as the public and legislature begin to take a hard look at how redevelopment funds are really being used. Longtime private property rights advocate Assemblyman Chris Norby points out these agencies were created to be "a temporary fix to a temporary problem,"and now serve as funding for projects such as restaurants and condos. Click here for article.

Prop 22 Throws Curveball on Gov. Brown's Proposal

2.26.11 - Cleverly written Prop 22 told voters they were voting to protect local funding for vital city services from state use, failing to advertise a provision in the proposition that also included redevelopment from state raids. The Contra Costa Times reports how this provision complicates any possibility of allowing RDAs to continue to function while diverting large amounts of funds back to the state. Read more here!

City of Grand Terrace to Disincorporate if RDA is Eliminated

2.26.11 - "For decades, administrators engineered the city's day-to-day operations to qualify for redevelopment funds, which were more plentiful than ordinary tax revenues," reports The Sun. The entire City of Grand Terrace is considered blighted and stands to lose it's title as a city if RDAs are eliminated. Read more on this outrageous case of RDA abuse here!

Examining the Real Numbers of Redevelopment

2.25.11 - The California Capitol blog breaks down specific numbers of redevelopment regarding how many jobs are really created by RDAs and more importantly, how much money goes to RDAs instead of schools, cities and counties. Budget holes that in turn, the state must cover. And we wonder why our budget deficit keeps growing! Read more here.

Alliance President Asks Republican Legislators to Speak Up on RDA Issues

2.25.11 - "Republicans simply can't profess to support a free market system that encourages businesses to compete, yet defend redevelopment schemes that allow government to pick the winners and losers in the market place," said Alliance President Marko Mlikotin in the Flash Report. Click here to read Mlikotin's call to Republican leaders to take a more active role in supporting Gov. Brown's proposal to abolish RDAs.

Glendale Hotel Owner and Developer Reach Agreement

2.24.11 - After a three- month public battle, developer Rick Caruso will purchase the Golden Key Hotel from owner Ray Patel for an undisclosed price. Private property rights advocates celebrate this small business owner not losing his land to eminent domain,as well as standing firm until he negotiated a fair price for his property. Read Glendale News Press article.

Democratic Houses Split on Gov. Brown's Proposal to Eliminate RDAs

2.24.11 - Reconciling differences in spending plans, a 10-member, 2-house committee had few kinks to iron out as spending plans developed by the 2 houses were similar, except for Gov. Brown's proposal to eliminate RDAs. The Senate supports abolishing RDAs, while the Assembly stands firm against ending these agencies. Read more here.

Cities Scramble to Save Redevelopment Funding

2.24.11 - "Unless we get public outrage and people to step up, we will lose our last economic engine," Fontana Mayor Acquanetta Warren told city officials Wednesday. Southern California city officials are scrambling to gather support to hang onto redevelopment funding as the RDA battle rages on. Read Inland Empire Daily Bulletin article.

Bill Ending Redevelopment Allows State to Kill Approved Projects

2.24.11 - The SF Gate reports that cities rushing to approve projects before the possible elimination of RDAs could be in a for a surprise when they find out a part of the proposal includes a caveat allowing the state to kill recently approved projects anytime within the next three years. Read more here.

Redevelopment Agency Officials Earn Big Bucks

2.22.11 - As California RDA officials continue to battle Gov. Brown's proposal to eliminate all 400 agencies, the six-figure salaries of some employees come under increased scrutiny. Read California Watch article here.

Negotiations in Glendale Land Battle Continue

2.22.11 - The Glendale News Press reports Golden Key Hotel owner Ray Patel and Americana developer Rick Caruso ask for an additional week to negotiate a deal allowing the mall to expand. Read article here.

Budget Crisis Acts as Opportunity to Rethink Purpose of RDAs

2.21.11 - Columnist George Skelton argues that the current budget crisis is a golden opportunity for legislators to rethink the value and purpose of redevelopment agencies saying "Redevelopment agencies need to clean up their acts or perish." Read article here.

Calbuzz: The Case for Why Redevelopment Must Go

2.21.11 - "In an era when California is faced with draconian cutbacks to higher education, schools, parks and public safety, the diversion of property taxes to redevelopment agencies is a luxury the state can no longer afford," states today's post on Calbuzz. The post delivers compelling evidence on why Gov. Brown's plan to abolish RDAs is a must! Read more here.

Cities Offer Alternative Plan to Abolishing RDAs

2.19.11 - The Sacramento Bee reports Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has headed up a plan to counter Gov. Brown's proposal of eliminating RDAs by suggesting RDAs loan funds to state to cover budget gap. Read more on what Gov. Brown's spokesman calls "some kind of Wall Street scheme to save redevelopment agencies."

Orange County Register Editorial: Land grab costs Laguna Woods

2.19.11 - In an uncommon display of justice in a Laguna Woods eminent domain case, an Orange County Superior Court judge awarded the property owner $851,000 to cover legal fees accumulated while fighting to keep their property. To read editorial, click here.

New High Speed Rail Map Cuts Through Valley Residents Backyards

2.19.11 - The Fresno Bee reports property owners in Hanford were surprised to see new high speed rail plans are intended to cut directly through their backyards! Original plans were slated hundreds of yards west of the new route. Read more on this unwelcome development here!

Elimination of RDAs Would Halt Stadium Plans in Southern California

2.19.11 - Dependent on RDA funds, two new stadiums planned for San Diego and Escondido will be shelved if Gov. Brown's proposal of eliminating RDAs comes to fruition. At at time when public services desperately need funding, can one really argue the merits of such excessive projects? Read LA Times article.

Redevelopment Agencies Rush Projects Forward to Utilize Funds

2.18.11 - Columnist Steven Greenhut addresses the increasingly bad behavior of RDAs around California as many agencies rush projects forward and further tie up RDA funding before the state can lay claim to those funds. Read Greenhut article.

RDA Funds Pay City Salaries In California

2.18.11 - The Los Angeles Times reports that cash strapped cities are using redevelopment funds to fund general services. Is it any wonder that they continue to deem small businesses and homes blighted in order to satisfy their need for more government spending? Read LA Times article here.

Senator Wolk Legislation Offers Alternative Financing to RDA Funds

2.17.11 - In response to Governor Brown's plan to abolish RDAs, Senator Lois Wolk offers a financing alternative in the form of Senate Bill 214 which she described as "a means of funding public works projects without affecting school districts or the state General Fund." Wolk's legislation would form infrastructure finanacing districts which unlike RDAs, would not have the power of eminent domain. For more on SB 214, click here.

Glendale Property Hearing to Resume Next Tuesday

2.16.11 - After an emotional public gathering of property rights advocates yesterday in front of Glendale City Hall, the fate of the Golden Key Hotel will ultimately be decided in a City Council hearing set for next Tuesday. Read coverage of the case in the Curbed LA and The LA Daily News and the Glendale News Press.

Golden Key Hotel Eminent Domain Hearing Postponed for Negotiations

2.15.11 - “Does the city stand with the city of Glendale, or does it stand with the wealthy or politically connected?” Alliance president asked rally attendees at Glendale City Hall this morning reports the Glendale News Press. Eminent domain opponents packed city council chambers in support of hotel owner Ray Patel, only to find the hearing will be pushed back a week. Read article here. Click on photo links for pictures of today's rally!

Photo 1 - Photo 2 - Photo 3

Americana and Golden Key Hotel to Face Off Tomorrow

2.14.11 - The Glendale News Press reports that tomorrow LA developer Rick Caruso and hotel owner Ray Patel will face off in a public hearing on the competing development proposal of Patel's property. The Alliance has publically supported Mr. Patel's efforts to stop another gross abuse of eminent domain by a city and is mentioned in the article. To read more, click here!

Elimination of RDA Threatens Glendale Plan to Expand Americana Mall

2.11.11 - Today's Glendale News Press editorial states "Glendale has big plans for the future: holding the threat of eminent domain over the Golden Key Hotel so developer Rick Caruso can expand retail at the Americana." Is the expansion of a mall at the expense of another business really the best use of public funding? Read editorial here.

Redevelopment Leader Considers Compromise to Gov. Brown's Proposal

2.10.11 - The Ventura Star reports that while RDA executive director John Shirey is considering revenue sharing as an alternative to Gov. Brown's proposal, supporters of the proposal like Treasurer Bill Lockyer are sticking to their guns calling redevelopment agencies "vampire agencies" as they are "sucking the blood of everybody around them for their own particular puposes." Read article here.

Glendale Land Grab Becomes RDA Abolishment Poster Child

2.10.11 - In a pointed CityWatch piece, the Glendale land grab is used as a prime example of redevelopment abuse in California. Read more here!

Gov. Brown's Proposal Creates Opportunity to Review RDA Reform

2.9.11 - The North County Times Editorial makes the case that now is the time to step back and "recalibrate how and when we use redevelopment districts --- to ensure that they really do provide an effective use of money that ultimately belongs to the taxpayers." Read article here.

Hercules Residents Organize Recall in Response to Questionable Deals Made by RDA

2.1.11 - The Contra Costa Times reports how residents of Hercules are standing up to RDA abuse and organizing the recall of two council members that supported "questionable 'sweetheart' development deals" that depleted city RDA funds. Read article here.

Alliance President Speaks Out in Glendale News-Press

1.31.11 - Alliance President urges Glendale residents to stand up against eminent domain abuse, warning that staying silent sends a message to the City Council and developers that "for the right price, no private property in Glendale is off limits." Read more here!

Alliance Puts Out Press Release Applauding Audit of CA RDAs

1.31.11 - The California Alliance to Protect Private Property Rights (The Alliance) sent out a press release today applauding CA State Controller's audit of 18 redevelopment agencies and asked property owners to report cases of eminent domain abuse to State auditors. Read press release here.

Time to Shine Light on California's Redevelopment Agencies

1.30.11 - The LA Times points to specific examples of California RDA abuse in various cities and the "5 billion in property taxes that would otherwise go to school districts, counties and the state," that is instead funneled to redevelopment agencies! Click here to read more.

Redevelopment Agencies - Moral Hazard? Many Think So...

1.30.11 - The Press Democrat features a guest opinion piece highlighting that "despite losing public funds, taxpayer funds" the city continues to plan bigger redevelopment projects. Yet another example of RDA misuse of citizen's hard-earned tax dollars! Read more here.

Assemblyman Chris Norby Champions for Elimination of RDAs

1.27.11 - Long-time proponent of private property rights, Assemblyman Chris Norby points out in The Orange County Register that "Faced with record deficits, what is the proper use of public moneys - to subsize theaters, new malls, pro sports teams and auto plazas? Or fully fund education and public services?" Read full article here!

Grantville Action Group Weighs in on RDA Abuse

1.27.11 - San Diego City Council members vote for a resolution to oppose the elimination of RDAs - Grantville Action Group CEO Brian Peterson offers pointed retort in the Voice of San Diego. Read letter here!

Report Contradicts Claims that RDAs Create Jobs

1.27.11 - Contradicting claims that redevelopment agencies create jobs, the Riverside Press Enterprise reports, "Many redevelopment agencies' recent reports to the state list few, if any, jobs created and little in the way of new construction or building rehabilitation, according to state data." Click here to read more.

Despite Passage of Prop 99, Eminent Domain Battles Rage On

1.27.11 - California Watch reports on a eminent domain case in Laguna Woods that highlights the limitations of Prop 99. Read full article here.

RDA Gives $52 Million to LA Developer to Build Garage

1.26.11 - Los Angeles based bloggers point out in two seperate posts how redevelopment funds are given to a billionaire developer instead of going to community services that truly benefit tax-paying citizens! Read Kaye blog and Rothman and Stewart blog.

Controller John Chiang to Audit Redevelopment Agencies

1.24.11 - As the redevelopment battle continues to build, State Controller John Chiang announces audit of 18 redevelopment agencies! Read press release here.

Assemblyman Chris Norby Finds Common Ground With Gov. Brown

1.23.11 - Calling redevelopment "the most wasteful, the most fradulent, and the most abusive spending in California government," GOP Assemblyman Chris Norby voices support for Gov. Brown's budget plan to eliminate redevelopment agencies. Read SF Gate article here.

Glendale Land Grab Moves Closer to Eminent Domain

1.20.11 - The Los Angeles Business Journal reports that developer is one step closer to expanding the Americana at Brand mall having purchased one of two properties, leaving Golden Key hotel owner alone in the property battle. Hotel owner refuses to sell and faces threat of eminent domain. Read article here.

Redevelopment Agencies are Real Blight

1.17.11 - The Orange County Register delivers a sharp and pointed editorial urging the Legislature to adopt Gov. Brown's plan to abolish California's 425 redevelopment agencies. Click here for editorial.

Greenhut Op-Ed: Brown targets corporate welfare

1.16.11 - In the North County Times, columnist Steven Greenhut calls Governor Brown's state budget the "beginning of the end for the state's redevelopment agencies." To read how Brown is targeting "corporate welfare" that threatens property rights click here.

Brown's Budget Unveiled Today -- Will Redevelopment Agencies Make the Cut?

1.10.11 - Brown's Countdown, Day 1: Plan takes on powerful redevelopment forces -- Old Sacramento was revived with the help of public redevelopment money, back in the 1960s. The city's new downtown nightlife venue, the "mermaid bar" complex on K Street, got millions of redevelopment dollars, too. Even the midtown loft building that Gov. Jerry Brown calls home was partially funded with redevelopment money. Dale Kasler in the Sacramento Bee reports.

Gov. Jerry Brown Rumored to End Redevelopment Agencies With Budget Proposal

1.5.2011 - The Mercury News reports Gov. Jerry Brown may look to end subsidized redevelopment statewide in an effort to free up funding for schools. Read full article here!

Rancho Cordova Eminent Domain Case Featured on Local News

1.4.2011 - On the CBS 13 news segment "On The Money" Alliance president spoke out on the recent Rancho Cordova eminent domain ruling asserting the property was aquired on the cheap and will be paid for at the expense of taxpayers! Read article and watch segment here.

Alliance President Speaks Out About Glendale Land Grab

12.30.10 - Alliance president calls out developer for using his influence with the Glendale City Council to aquire a hotel by eminent domain in order to expand a shopping mall. Alliance calls tactics "theft" of private property. Read more here!

After 20 Years Proposed Shopping Center Moves Forward

12.27.10 - The South Los Angeles Report reveals that after a messy, 20 year struggle involving eminent domain abuse and gross "political influence and favoritism in the redevelopment process," the shopping center project pushes forward towards completion. Read full article here.

High-Speed Rail Route Aims at Agricultural Land

12.27.10 - In an effort to bypass towns, high-speed rail officals eyeball agricultural land putting Central Valley farmers on high alert. Read LA Times article here.

Billionaire Developer Bids Higher, Hotelier Holds His Ground

12.24.10 - Despite making it clear that the Golden Key Hotel is not for sale, property owner Ray Patel continues to be hassled by billionaire developer Rick Caruso to sell his land. Patel was given 45 days by the City of Glendale to sell, create redevelopment plans or have his property taken through eminent domain. The Glendale News-Press reports on Caruso's new offer here and on Patel's rejection of the offer here.

As Tensions Rise in Glendale, Hotelier Speaks Up

12.21.10 - Pushed by the City of Glendale to sell his property to developer Rick Caruso or be forced out by way of eminent domain, hotel owner Ray Patel gives his side of the story to the Glendale News-Press. Read full article here.

Owner of Fresno Church Shortchanged by School District

12.20.10 - Pastor Luis Milian of La Promesa church fights low offer made by Fresno Unified School District to purchase property for planned elementary school. If a negotiation cannot be made, the District plans to use power of eminent domain. Read full Fresno Bee article or watch KMPH Fox 26 news clip of the story.

L.A. City Officals Lock Local Church Doors and Hide the Key

12.16.2010 - In a shocking turn of events in downtown Los Angeles, commissioner Robert Andrade closes and locks the doors of local church without informing the pastor nor parishers! Reduced to limited hours of operation, it appears the City and Andrade are aiming to take church over completely. For what remains unclear. Full article here.

Legal Challenge to Rancho Cordova Eminent Domain Case Overruled

12.10.2010 - After a long and contentious battle against the city of Rancho Cordova, land owner Sam Fong loses eminent domain case this past week. Despite the overruling, Fong vows to continue fight. Read the full RC Grapevine article.

Glendale Council Pushes Neighorboring Property Owners to Negotiate or Threaten Eminent Domain

12.3.2010 - Glendale City Council recently approved a plan to force neighorbing property owners to sell their buildings to developer Rick Caruso or lose their land through eminent domain. The shocking part? One of the buildings is an up-and-running, 55-room hotel! Read the whole article here. See follow-up editorial in the Glendale News Press by clicking here.

High-Speed Rail Deemed "Train to Nowhere"

11.29.2010 - As the Feds dump billions of dollars into a project Sacramento Bee columnist Dan Walters calls "the train to nowhere," UC Researchers suggest the High Speed Rail Authority grossly overestimates ridership and revenues from the project. Read full article here.

Popular San Marcos Restaurant Required to Move for Housing Development

11.15.2010 - The North County Times reports Mr. Taco in San Marcos, which opened in 1985 is being forced to relocate in Vista to accomodate the construction of a planned affordable housing complex. Read more here!

California Alliance to Protect Private Property Rights Endorses Michael Booth

11.2.10 - The Alliance recently endorsed candidate Michael Booth for Vista City Council as he represents a strong voice for redevelopment reform and vows to fight eminent domain abuse in Vista! To learn more about Mr. Booth, click here.

San Joaquin County Officials Take Aim at Ranch Land Through Eminent Domain

10.27.2010 - With their sights set on thousands of acres of ranch land, San Joaquin County water officials prepare to use eminent domain and this follows lawsuits! Read more by clicking here!

Rancho Cordova Eminent Domain Fight Continues in Court

10.25.10 - The Sacramento Bee reports on landowner and developer Lily Co. fighting to block the Rancho Cordova Redevelopment Agency from taking 9.5 acres through eminent domain. Read full story!

Azusa Uses Eminent Domain to Acquire Furniture Station

10.22.2010 - Azusa City officals celebrate an eminent domain victory against the Furniture Station despite the fact that the property was not considered blighted! Full article here.

Rancho Cordova Small Business Owners Continue Zoning Battle

10.18.10 - The Sacramento Business Journal reports on the continued push from the City of Rancho Cordova to change zoning codes threatening small businesses along Folsom Boulevard, as well as the building eminent domain battle one local business owner continues to face. Read more.

Local Rancho Cordova Business Owners Form Coalition

10.15.10 - Rancho Cordova small business owners formed the Rancho Cordova Small Business Coalition in response to changes in local Zoning Codes, threats of eminent domain and other potential abuse of property rights being imposed by the City. Read more here.

Oakland Land Owner Faces Eminent Domain Threat for Second Time

10.4.10 –The Oakland City Council is hoping to expand its power of eminent domain to acquire property proposed for a supermarket.  This is the second time the property owner has been threatened by eminent domain! Without even contacting the property owner to see if he would sell his property willingly, the City appears to be moving towards stealing it outright! Read more.

Upcoming Event - Conference on Redevelopment Abuse

Please join the 15th Annual Northern California Conference on Redevelopment Abuse on October 1st, 8am - 4:30pm at the Sacramento Sheraton.

Assemblyman Chris Norby and other public officials, labor leaders, attorneys and community activists concerned about financial and property abuses by California Redevelopment Agencies will be in attendence! For more information, please visit our Events link or click here.

New State Water Project Threatens Family Pear Business

9.12.10 – The Bee reports on a family farming operation threatened by a new State water project. The State is using eminent domain to acquire property that has been in the family pear business for generations. Read more.

Prop. 22 - Defending the Indefensible

9.12.10 – In the Orange County Register editorial, "Prop 22. defends the indefensible" the Register makes the case for voters to oppose Prop 22. Click here to read more.

LA City Council Approves Shopping Mall on Seized Private Property

9.9.10 – Yesterday Los Angeles City Council approved plans to build a shopping mall in South Central LA.  The land had been seized through eminent domain from resident Stanley Kramer and despite legal efforts to prevent the mall from being built, the project will move forward.  Click here for more on this private property injustice.

Legislation to Undermine State Redevelopment Law

September 8 , 2010 - Read Bee columnist Dan Walter's column on how special interest groups are trying to use their influence in the State Capitol to reverse redevelopment reforms that protect private property from eminent domain abuse. Shocking? No. Read more.

Rancho Cordova Land Grab Featured on "Fox and Friends"

August 19, 2010 - Today, a Rancho Cordova land grab case was featured on the nationally syndicated "Fox and Friends" show. To view this outrageous example of eminent domain abuse, click here. This is a classic example of how developers can work with local government to acquire private property on the cheap!

Continued news coverage of the City of Rancho Cordova's ongoing efforts to use eminent domain to seize private property from unwilling sellers…

August 10, 2010 - Learn how a local property owner had a deal to sell his property for over $8 million to a community college. Then the City of Rancho Cordova intervened by using eminent domain to seize the property and offered the property owner more than 50% less for the property so that they can sell it to the very same community college for a profit!   Unbelievable? Yes, but true! Click here to see "On the Money" coverage of this developing story.

Vista Committee Members Question Redevelopment Spending

July 19, 2010 – While the City of Vista is in the process of acquiring numerous downtown properties which officials “hope to sell . . . to private developers who will construct mixed-use buildings,” members of the Project Area Committee are questioning what the City has been spending its redevelopment money on. Click here to read the North County Times article.

High-Speed Rail Concerns in Gilroy

July 19, 2010 – Residents and community leaders in Gilroy are becoming increasingly cynical about the High-Speed Rail Project as property owners worry about property condemnations, eminent domain and other impacts. Yet, the community has yet to get any answers from the rail authority with Council Member Perry Woodward saying, “to a large extent, I just think this is a dog-and-pony show they’re putting on.” Read the recent Gilroy Dispatch articles – “Property owners brace for fight with High-Speed Rail Authority” and “Halt the bullet”.

Redevelopment Done Right

July 11, 2010 – The Bay area city of Newark has approved a redevelopment strategy that leaders hope will rejuvenate the local economy. Unlike many communities who use redevelopment to seize homes and businesses for private development, the City of Newark decided not to include the power of eminent domain. Instead, the city plans to work with property owners to make community improvements. Read more.

Redevelopment Agencies – Community Asset or Detriment?

July 5, 2010 – While the City of Fontana’s redevelopment agency is among the wealthiest in the state, the San Bernardino Sun examines whether redevelopment agencies are the valuable assets city officials claim or really just “corporate welfare centers for well-connected developers.” Read more.

Where Does U.S. Supreme Court Nominee Kagan Stand on Kelo?

June 27, 2010 – Columnist George F. Will proposes some tough questions for U.S. Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan, including addressing the 2005 Kelo vs. New London decision which said “government can seize property for the ‘public use’ of transferring it to wealthier private interests who will pay more taxes to the government.” Click here to read more.

Rancho Cordova City Council Refuses to Sign Private Property Rights Pledge

June 16. 2010 - Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s controversial Kelo v. New London decision that sanctioned government’s ability to forcibly seize private property from unwilling sellers for the purpose of economic development, elected officials throughout the U.S. have rejected this invitation to abuse private property rights by signing the “Hands Off My Home Pledge” - a pledge members of the Rancho Cordova City Council have refused to sign!

So, why hasn’t even one member of the council signed the pledge? Is it because they support ongoing efforts to use eminent domain to seize private property along Folsom Boulevard and within the city’s redevelopment district? Their silence should concern local property owners for until Rancho Cordova’s elected leaders sign the pledge or pass a local ordinance limiting their power of eminent domain, the threat of abuse is very real.

Click here to learn how private property rights are under attack in Rancho Cordova.

City of Stockton’s “Gross Abuse of Discretion” in Eminent Domain Taking

June 8, 2010 – The City of Stockton will pay a $2.5 million settlement following a 2004 land acquisition a court called a “gross abuse of discretion.” The Marina Tower property was taken by eminent domain and demolished in 2004 with the city allegedly planning to hand it over to a private developer to build apartments. Read the Stockton Record article.

Redevelopment Plans Falter along Metro Gold Line Expansion

June 6, 2010 – While city officials bemoan the loss of redevelopment funds to the state, too often these funds were misused to seize property for private development. Redevelopment plans around the proposed Metro Gold Line expansion in several Southern California communities are faltering. In Azusa, property assembled for a proposed retail project may be at risk because the city “can no longer afford to part with the land at below-market prices.” And the City of Arcadia blames their challenges on an ordinance limiting eminent domain. “We don’t have that leverage that we could use to negotiate,” says City Manager Don Penman. Read more.

High-Speed Rail Saga Continues

May 17, 2010 – In yet another setback for the proposed High-Speed rail development, Union Pacific, which operates freight trains up and down the state, is objecting to plans to place high-speed rail tracks next to its tracks for some 200 miles. Union Pacific’s opposition follows reports of increasing costs for the proposal as well as concern from property owners who will be impacted and possibly lose their homes by eminent domain to make way for the rail system. The San Diego Union-Tribune says of the high-speed rail proposal, “The rail authority’s problem with Union Pacific is just one more powerful reason to call it quits.”

City of Indio Sits on Seized Property

May 17, 2010 – The Indio City Council is continuing their long history of eminent domain abuse, taking properties with no plans to use these properties to build schools, roads or for any other “public use.” Instead, the city’s misguided redevelopment efforts over the past 20+ years have cost over $20 million dollars and left vacant eyesores, with the city holding on to the properties until they can sell it off to developers. Longtime resident Al Meza, whose business was taken in the late 80’s “said he has yet to see something tangible come from the city-owned properties.” Read more.

Redevelopment Money Better Spent Elsewhere

May 7, 2010 – Last week, a Superior Court ruling upheld the State Legislature’s authority over redevelopment agency money, requiring local redevelopment agencies throughout the state to hand more than $2.7 billion over to the state for education spending. In this Orange County Register opinion piece, State Assemblyman Chris Norby cites failed redevelopment programs as a “permanent drain on the budget," saying “Last year, redevelopment agencies diverted $5.4 billion in local taxes within their zones – 12 percent of all property taxes. That amounted to $2.7 billion taken from public schools. . .”  He also addresses the fact that redevelopment, often under the threat of eminent domain, often benefits developers and giant retailers at the expense of property owners and taxpayers. Read more.

San Pablo Drops Plans to Reinstate Eminent Domain

May 4, 2010 – Due to public outrage, the City of San Pablo reversed course and dropped plans to reinstate its redevelopment agency’s power of eminent domain. Residents feared that eminent domain would be used to seize their property for the benefit of out of town developers. "Instead of being for the people, you are for the developers," resident Adolfo Sanchez told the City Council. The Alliance applauds the San Pablo City Council for making the fair decision to protect the community’s private property rights. Read the Contra Costa Times article by clicking here.

San Jose’s Pursuit of A’s Stadium Could Cost Property Owners – And Taxpayers

April 25, 2010 - The City of San Jose continues to pursue plans to lure the Oakland A’s Major League Baseball team to town. However, the plan will require San Jose to spend millions of dollars to assemble the property and even more to improve access to the stadium. The city currently owns less than half the property needed for the A’s stadium. And despite a $116 million budget deficit, the city has budgeted $35 million over the next 5 years to buy properties to complete the project – properties that include homes, small businesses and a 72-year-old book wholesaler who haven’t been asked if they want to sell. Should any of these property owners hold out, the city could use eminent domain to take their homes and small businesses – even if the ballpark never materializes! According to the San Jose Mercury News, if the ballpark plan falls through, the city “plans to continue buying up the 14 acres and build a mix of offices, housing and retail at the site.” “The city’s just thinking about themselves,” said an employee of an industrial gas supply company which sits on the location of the proposed field and who hopes they won’t have to relocate.

Rancho Cordova - Demolishing Private Property Rights

April 23, 2010 - At an April meeting of the Rancho Cordova City Council, the City leaders adopted a series of policy “priorities,” including one that involves the use of eminent domain, government’s power to seize private property from unwilling sellers for the benefit of developers. As originally drafted, the priority read to “Demolish a private sector building each year.” Hard to believe they said this, but they did!

This is not fair and is why eminent domain has no place among the city’s “priorities,” no matter how it is phrased. The Alliance has joined with local property owners who believe that a more deserving priority would be redevelopment practices that encourage urban renewal without threatening people’s homes and small businesses. Hopefully, the City Council can see the benefits of sharing these values and reverse course on an agenda to “demolish” private property rights.

To learn more about this local movement, click here. For related article, click here.

San Pablo Residents Oppose Reinstating Eminent Domain

April 17, 2010 - San Pablo residents are opposing the city’s plans to reinstate the power of eminent domain for 12 more years.  Residents are fearful that Prop. 99, a statewide measure passed by voters in 2008, contains loopholes that will not protect homeowners should the city desire to use eminent domain to take their property for commercial development. Read the Contra Costa Times article by clicking here.

Voters in Sierra Madre Approve Measure Limiting Eminent Domain

April 15, 2010 - Voters in Sierra Madre scored a victory for property rights on Tuesday when they overwhelmingly approved Measure ED, limiting the city’s power of eminent domain. The measure prohibits the city from using eminent domain for private purposes without the property owner’s consent. To read the article, click here.

High Speed Rail Proposal Concerns Peninsula Property Owners

April 6, 2010 - Property Owners in communities throughout the San Francisco Bay area Peninsula are voicing concerns about the proposed High Speed Rail. The main concerns include the use of eminent domain to take properties, and noise and vibration caused by the train.  The rail authority has proposed the Pacheco Pass through the Peninsula as the Bay Area route.  Click here to learn more as well as where affected property owners can submit comments.

Martinez Community Fights Redevelopment Plans

March 31, 2010 - The Martinez community is once again fighting City Hall’s attempts to establish a Redevelopment Agency.  Community members fear that redevelopment will take money away from schools, police and other community services. They also fear the use of eminent domain to take private property.  While redevelopment plans have been discussed for the past 50 years, opponents have so far prevailed in preventing the formation of a redevelopment agency. To read the story in the Contra Costa Times, click here.

Caltrans as a Landlord?

March 25, 2010 - A glaring example of the misuse of eminent domain by government agencies, Pasadena Weekly reports that Caltrans owns more than 18,000 homes, apartment buildings and farms throughout California, all seized through eminent domain for planned freeway construction. Yet, the state is holding on to this surplus property while freeway construction has stalled, often for decades.  In L.A.’s 710 corridor, Caltrans owns nearly 500 homes, most seized in the 1960’s with plans to tear down the homes and build a freeway connector. However, due to funding, the project will likely never be built.  Instead of selling these properties, Caltrans becomes a landlord – with properties either rented or sitting vacant – and with California’s taxpayers footing the bill.

San Francisco Redevelopment Threatens African American Community

March 21, 2010 - Not long ago, San Francisco and the Fillmore district was a thriving African American community of 100,000 strong.  Following the ‘urban renewal’ efforts of the 1970’s, the African American population shrunk to a mere 40,000.  Today, Bayview Hunters Point has been called the “last bastion of concentrated Black life” in the city.  Now, residents of the Bayview Hunters Point area are again faced with a city’s redevelopment plan that threatens to drive even more out of the community. According to an article by Ahimsa Porter Sumchai, M.D., the redevelopment project threatens to "deprive the African American people of Bayview Hunters Point of land, historical legacy and culture in a region where they have predominated as an ethnic group since the World War II era."

Stockton Resident Supports Proposition 16 - Opposes SSJID's Eminent Domain Action Against PG&E

March 20, 2010 - A letter to the editor in the Stockton Record points out the positive effects of Proposition 16, which will appear on the ballot this June.  The letter says, “South San Joaquin Irrigation District has accumulated millions of taxpayer dollars because certain bonds are now paid off. That money belongs to us, the people in the district. Instead, SSJID has already squandered $12 million in its quixotic misadventure to take over PG&E's electric power business in the south county - without the consent of the voters. It will likely cost the people hundreds of millions more dollars if it succeeds, via eminent domain, in taking PG&E's business.”

Waterfront Property Owners in Stockton Fight City Plans

March 19, 2010 - Property owners on Stockton’s Deep Sea Channel are fighting the city’s Waterfront Connection Plan.  The project would connect over 5 miles of waterfront property to create a pedestrian/bicycle trail. While the city believes the project will help revitalize downtown, property owners rightly believe the loss of waterfront property will devalue their land by some 25 percent.  One property owner, Greg Culhane said, "If you take my waterfront, you're taking the soul and the heart of my property, the reason I bought that property."  To read the story in the Stockton Record, click here.

Lack of Eminent Domain Reforms Threatens Milpitas Property Owners

March 18, 2010 - Proposition 99 continues to fail small business owners in Milpitas. The city has scheduled two upcoming meetings to consider "reinstating eminent domain over non-residential uses in the amendment areas" as well as add some 600 acres to the redevelopment project area. While the city claims no eminent domain action will be taken on residential properties, small businesses, churches and many other properties that create jobs and shape our communities have no protections. To learn more about the threat to small business owners, read the Milpitas Post article by clicking here.

Vista Redevelopment Committee Member Warns Community of Eminent Domain

March 17, 2010 - While the City of Vista has plans to take property by eminent domain for private development, the North County Times reports that Jerome Hymes, a member of the City of Vista’s redevelopment Project Area Committee is standing up for local property owners. Hymes distributed a letter to local businesses warning that "their property may be in danger of being seized by the city," and stating that the city has "no intentions to treat property owners as partners" in the redevelopment process. Hymes told his colleagues on the Committee that he distributed the letter to educate downtown business owners and "Sometimes it takes a public to get government or cities to listen," Hymes said. "If other people are asking, maybe you'll see it as important." To read the article, click here.

High Speed Rail: Troubles in Southern California

February 12, 2010 - The California High Speed Rail Authority’s plan to bring a bullet train to the state is not only hitting roadblocks in the San Francisco Bay Area, Southern California communities are expressing concerns too! The City of Glendale has discovered that the proposed tracks would run right through land that is currently slated for a $20 million dollar mixed use development that they purport is critical to their local economy. Perhaps, Councilman Ara Najarian said it best, “What should we tell them [the developers]? Back off? There’s going to be eminent domain?” Read the Burbank Leader article by clicking here.

Seven Year Old Eminent Domain Case: Over, But Not Forgotten

Seven long years ago, the City of San Jose bungled an eminent domain attempt on the Tropicana shopping center. Yesterday the all but-forgotten property rights story became center stage in a debate between candidates seeking a spot on the San Jose City Council. The San Jose Mercury reports that, “Some of the more pointed questions came from the Tropicana merchants addressing the city's failed 2003 eminent domain takeover of the shopping center that ended in settlements costing taxpayers $8 million.” It is good to see that property owners are holding those seeking public office accountable for their actions and ensuring that they understand and respect the property rights of those that they serve.

California High Speed Rail: The Saga Continues

January 19, 2010 – Once again the California High Speed Rail is proving too good to be true. As we have said before, the train will make its way through cities, usurping the land that is needed for the rail by seizing private property through eminent domain. Now, a column in the San Jose Mercury News is reporting that ticket prices, which were promoted to voters as reasonable, are intended to compete with plane tickets. Though the High Speed Rail might have showed some promise, it is slowly turning into a bureaucratic nightmare. Landowners beware!

BALLOT MEASURE QUALIFIES FOR JUNE BALLOT

January 14, 2010 – The Secretary of State reports that a statewide ballot measure that will make it more difficult for public agencies to seize private utility companies by eminent domain has qualified for the June ballot. For example, if the measure qualifies the South San Joaquin Irrigation District will have to place their plan to seize PG&E’s property by eminent domain on the ballot – essentially dooming their scheme.  Read the San Francisco Chronicle article by clicking here.

Property rights champion wins Assembly seat!

January 12, 2010 – Orange County Supervisor Chris Norby has been elected to the California State Assembly! Norby has also been actively involved in our organization and with Municipal Officials for Redevelopment Reform where he played a major role in authoring Redevelopment: The Unknown Government -- an extensive report on eminent domain abuse and redevelopment in California and what can be done about it. Congratulations Assemblyman-elect Norby! Read more about Norby’s win in the by clicking here.

Property owners sue to prevent government from accessing their land

January 11, 2010 – The State is seeking access to 170 properties for the purpose of exporting Northern California water to Southern California. Properties owners are suing to stop the government from trappeling on their property. Read the Stockton Record editorial by clicking here.

Political scholar pens insightful piece on Brooklyn Yards

January 4, 2010 – The Alliance has been following this story for some time, but George Will has penned an insightful piece on the Brooklyn Yards eminent domain scandal. Will chronicles the woe of an area that is by no means blighted (despite the city’s best attempts to call it such) and the attempts of a billionaire developer to get his way, no matter what the cost, in order to build a sports arena.

Property owner comes out on top in lawsuit brought on by city

January 4, 2010 – The City of Pittsburg has finally settled the lawsuit they brought against the innocent owner of Marine Express because he refused give up his property! While rare, we are happy to report that the owner prevailed. To learn more about this story, read the Contra Costa Times article by clicking here.

Could federal stimulus dollars be used for eminent domain?

January 3, 2010 – The City of Rosemead has reinstated the use of eminent domain for redevelopment purposes. However, their city “renewal plan” explicitly calls for using stimulus dollars to seize private property from unwilling sellers. Are federal tax dollars intended to create jobs being used to seize private property? We’ll soon see. To read the Pasadena Star-News article, click here.

San Joaquin Irrigation District Launches PR Campaign to Seize Private Property

December 28, 2009 – The Modesto Bee reports that the South San Joaquin Irrigation District (SSJID) has mounted a PR campaign to seize PG&E’s private property by eminent domain by winning the hearts and minds of local ratepayers. However, local ratepayers would be wise to see through this campaign and read the fine print. According to PG&E, the irrigation district is woefully understating the value of its assets and this could drive up the cost of seizing PG&E’s assets – meaning that all costs associated with using eminent domain will be passed on to SSJID ratepayers in the form of higher electricity rates.

City Takes Positive Steps in Redevelopment Restraint

December 19, 2009 – In 2005, after tumultuous dealings with redevelopment, the citizens of Chula Vista passed a ballot measure that would prohibit the City from taking property for private development. Four years later, Chula Vista might be on the right track to property owner-friendly redevelopment by holding public meetings to learn what the community would like to see. The city’s redevelopment agency has also seen a tightening of the belt in terms of its budget and administrative costs. It is a positive development to see a city working with the community and listening to their concerns, as well as making budget friendly changes – we hope other cities take notice! Read more about this story by clicking here.

Once Bitten, Twice Shy - Sacramento’s $40 million redevelopment project fails

December 11, 2009 - Downtown Sacramento’s K Street has been a hotbed of eminent domain activity for years and failed redevelopment projects that fail time after time. In 2008, the City exercised eminent domain over K Street property owner Moe Mohanna by forcing the sale of his property for over $18 million. When all is said and done, the city will have poured $40 million to the redevelopment project (taxpayer dollars) with nothing to show for it! Now the city is scrapping its latest plan and trying again. When will they learn? When will taxpayers revolt?

Silicon Valley City Aims to Close Proposition 99 Loopholes

December 10, 2009 – The Mercury News reports that the City of Sierra Madre is attempting to do what Proposition 99 failed to do – protect property owners from eminent domain takings for private use. A City Counsel-sponsored measure which aims to do just that will be on the ballot in April. Councilman John Buchanan supports the measure saying, "Taking one person's private property to hand it to another is morally questionable, to say the least.” We could not agree more and urge the citizens of Sierra Madre to support this measure.

City of Winsor Extends Police Powers of Redevelopment Agency

December 10, 2009 - The Town of Winsor has recently taken steps to extend the life of the city’s Redevelopment Agency. Unfortunately, the town is hiding behind this power grab by using ‘blight’ as an excuse. Although the city claims that it will not take residential properties, it does have the power to take “commercial properties” – a fancy way of saying businesses! This is just proof again that Proposition 99 did not go far enough in protecting property owners. Read the Santa Rosa Press Democrat story by clicking here.

Senator Tom Harman's Take on Property Rights

December 10, 2009 - Senator Tom Harman pens a column for the Huntington Independent stressing the importance of private property rights from a historical perspective. Senator Harman also calls for the Kelo v. New London decision to be reversed and revisits the story of the City of New London and where their ‘redevelopment’ project stands today.

New Private Property Rights Case will be heard by U.S. Supreme Court

December 3, 2009 - The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear one of the biggest property rights cases since Kelo v. New London. Owners of beautiful beachfront property on the Florida Panhandle have had their private access beaches usurped by the Florida Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA). How you ask? By using erosion corrections as a guise, the FEPA has added sand to the beaches, but instead of extending the property lines -- they declared it a public beach! This action has made these valuable beachfront properties, beachfront no longer. The property owners are fighting against FEPA, as their property values have hit had by the loss of the private beach. The Wall Street Journal said an opinion piece featuring the case, “The Florida case is all the weirder because the beaches in question aren't threatened by erosion and some have grown naturally in recent years, adding to the suspicion that "beach renourishment" is a state pretext to gain waterfront rights in a desirable area.” Government’s far reaching hand has once again encroached on property rights and we can only hope the Supreme Court sets them straight.

• Wall Street Journal Opinion piece
• Wall Street Journal Article

Champion of Property Rights Poised to take 72nd Assembly District Seat

November 19, 2009 - In a special election held this week, Orange County Supervisor Chris Norby was the top vote earner in the 72nd Assembly District. Norby has been a champion of property rights in California, having formed Municipal Officials for Redevelopment Reform (MORR) and was a staunch advocate for Proposition 98, which would have brought Californians real eminent domain reform. Supervisor Norby told the Whittier Daily, “I think fixing redevelopment is part of fixing the state's fiscal mess. We've got a Byzantine mess of how we fund public services. (Redevelopment) hijacks money that would normally go for public services.” Norby will now face a run off against Democrat John MacMurray and is expected to win the heavily Republican seat. The Alliance looks forward to having a friend of private property rights and redevelopment reform in the legislature. Congratulations, Supervisor Norby!

New London Redevelopment Plan Scratched!

November 11, 2009 - Private property advocates across the country hope that a lesson will be learned as Pfizer, Inc. reports it will be closing its research and development headquarters in New London, Connecticut, the site made famous by the U.S. Supreme Courts Kelo vs. City of New London decision.Today, the homes of Suzette Kelo and her neighbors, which were seized for the private gain of this powerful corporation, are gone and the property sits vacant. “This is truly an example of the failure of our nation’s eminent domain laws,” said Marko Mlikotin, president of the Alliance.

• Read the San Francisco Examiner article
• Read the Alliance Press Release

Proposition 99 Loopholes Exploited by City of Vista

November 10, 2009 - In the City of Vista, the Redevelopment Agency has taken interest in purchasing the propety of a local motel owner in order to place a car dealership there. There is one problem, however. The owner has stated that he is unequivocally not interested in selling. So far, the City Council has promised not to take homes as part of its redevelopment efforts, but now they say that businesses do not apply to their policy. This is a perfect example of how Proposition 99's purported protections are a sham, as they do not protect the business and livlihoods of small business owners. We could not agree more with the North County Times in its editorial today when it states that, "It is flat-out wrong to even hint at using (let alone to use) eminent domain to grab someone's property, only to give or sell it to another private interest."

A Potentially Perilous Plan for a New San Diego Chargers Stadium

November 10, 2009 - The City of San Diego and their hometown Chargers are in talks to build a $1 billion football stadium in downtown. This project would require the heavy hand of redevelopment and perhaps eminent domain. Although we try to remain optimistic with such endeavors, San Diego has made the task a little more difficult with its notably bad choices when it comes to private property rights. A little over five years ago the Gran Havana, a local small business located downtown, was seized by the city, bulldozed and then paved over for a a hotel never built. Today it is a parking lot! Regrettably, the city has not ruled out the use of eminent domain for the stadium and it doesn’t look good for the Wonder Bread building, which is located in the 14 acres they intend to use for the stadium. This makes it a prime target for eminent domain abuse, unless the owners can reach an agreement with the city. Although nothing has been formalized, we strongly urge San Diego to consider property owners in its quest to bring the Chargers downtown. Read the San Diego Union Tribune article to learn more about the city’s stadium plans.

Family's Dream Property Seized by City of Lake Forest

November, 5, 2009 - As we noted here in September, the Hernandez family had plans to build a business venture on a plot of land now desired by the City of Lake Forest who has plans to enter into a land swap deal with Orange County. The primary reason why the Hernandez Family has refused to sell their property so far is the city is offering an unacceptable purchasing price. So like many public agencies seeking property on the cheap, the city announced this week that they will play hardball by invoking eminent domain. The greatest investment of their lives’ is now becoming a nightmare. Read the Orange County Register article by clicking here.

Conference on Redevelopment Abuse

October 27, 2009 – On Saturday, November 7th, Municipal Officials for Redevelopment Reform (MORR) will be holding its 15th Annual Conference on Redevelopment Abuse. For more information on the event, location and featured speakers, click here.

Boondoggles – Stockton among Redevelopment Projects that Fall Short of Promises

October 25, 2009 –Redevelopment agencies run by local government promise great economic returns to taxpayers, when in reality the projects often come at the expense of property owners. Dan Walters, in his recent Bee column, cites many such examples in California. While it is noteworthy for Walters to underscore how frequently redevelopment projects fleece taxpayers, they are not the only victims. All too often property owners lose their homes and livelihood to these failed redevelopment projects. This was certainly the case in Stockton.

Champion of Private Property Rights Running for State Assembly

October 26, 2009 - Chris Norby, Orange County Supervisor and leader of Municipal Officials for Redevelopment Reform, is running for the California State Assembly. Steven Greenhut, an editorial writer for the Orange County Register and author of Abuse of Power, writes a column defending Norby’s character and record on private property rights. Greenhut is absolutely right to do so for when State legislators (Republicans too) gave lip service to private property rights, Norby was on the front line taking on special interests groups and putting the interests of property owners first.

Action Alert: Contact Calfornia Gubernatorial Candidates

October 23, 2009 – While the California election for Governor seems like a way off, it is not too soon for the candidates to share with voters their position on private property rights and how they intend to limit government’s ability to seize homes, businesses, family farms and churches. As far as we are aware, only former eBay CEO Meg Whitman has revealed her position to a political blogger. However, to date not one candidate, whether Republican or Democrat, has posted a detailed policy position on private property rights to their campaign website. Contact the candidates and let them know that voters have a right to know where they stand.

Ripon City Council Pro Eminent Domain

October 22, 2009 - As reported in the Manteca Bulletin, the Ripon City Council passed a resolution endorsing the South San Joaquin Irrigation District’s plan to forcibly seize PG&E’s power lines by eminent domain. The plan not only violates private property rights, but it is fraught with danger and unintended consequences. For one, the purported savings to current ratepayers is questionable and by no means guaranteed. The city council appears to agree since they modified the resolution saying it "may" provide local ratepayer savings, instead of “shall." Wow… so they endorse taking of private property even though they concede that the benefits to their constituents is by no means “guaranteed!”

Effort to Seize Property for Basketball Franchise No Slam Dunk

October 14, 2009 – The Wall Street Journal reports of New York state property owners who are suing to stop a redevelopment agency from building a new arena for the New Jersey Nets basketball team. Rightfully so, they take issue with a government agency seizing private property by eminent domain to benefit a private developer. As another example of how government’s frequent claim that “public benefits” outweigh private property rights often run afoul and hits taxpayers in the pocketbook, the city’s independent budget office reports that the taxpayer financed project will “cost the city nearly $170 million, nearly $40 million more in spending than it would generate in tax revenue.” What is the public benefit of being fleeced?

Los Angeles Seizes Land From Citizens, Gives to Billionaire Developer!

October 8, 2009 - An eye opening article in LA Weekly reveals that despite growing budget deficits, the Los Angeles Community Development Association (LA – CRA) used eminent domain and taxpayer dollars to finance a downtown redevelopment project. In essence, while projects for the poor are cut, the rich and famous are getting government handouts in LA! To make matters worse, private property seized by eminent domain was used to build a Ritz Carlton hotel! ” The LA Weekly article goes on to say that “the eminent domain takings in the area of what is now Staples and L.A. Live in the 1990s left many private landowners deeply embittered over being forced off their property at “market/fair value.” In one case, a developer got a taxpayer subsidy only to flip the property and sell it to another developer, and did not return the property to its original owner. Alliance President Marko Mlikotin is quoted in the article saying, “The CRA was using public dollars to seize private properties. Shouldn’t that property revert to the original owner?” You can read the rest of the LA Weekly article by clicking here.

Gubernatorial Candidate Meg Whitman Takes Firm Stand for Property Rights

October 7, 2009 – In a recent interview with FlashReport, a major political blog, gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman and former CEO of eBay, lays out her position on private property rights and government’s use of eminent domain. Whitman is quoted as saying, “My view is that it should be very hard for the government, or a city, or a county to take people's property rights. Property rights is a core part of, I think, why people live in America. Think about the history of owning property in the United States. It's the American dream.” Since California has among the weakest private property rights laws in the Nation, we can only hope that this issue is important to all the gubernatorial candidates.

U.S. Supreme Court Battle –
Home Seized for a Redevelopment Project Never Built

October 4, 2009 - In 2005 Susette Kelo’s pink home was taken by eminent domain for private redevelopment project, a fight she took all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. In its famous Kelo vs. New London decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against Ms. Kelo by granting local government greater authority and ease by which they can seize homes, small business and family farms from unwilling sellers. Ironically, some four years later The Associated Press is reporting that the site where her home once stood is still empty! As she puts it, “"They are getting what they deserve. They are going to get nothing. I don't think this is what the United States Supreme Court justices had in mind when they made this decision."

Family’s Dream Crushed by Eminent Domain

September 18, 2009 - The Hernandez family has dreamed of building their business on property they picked years ago, but now the City of Lake Forest is trying to take it in a land swap deal with the Orange County. Although the city has expressed interest in purchasing the land, the family refuses to sell. The fate of the Hernandez family’s dream remains to be seen and any glimmer of hope seems to be dwindling by the day. To read The Orange County Register's in-depth look at this story, click here.

City of Manteca Votes to Support Taking of PG&E Assets

September 18, 2009 - Yesterday, at great risk to their political future, the Manteca City Council voted to support the South San Joaquin Irrigation District’s (SSJID) plan to forcibly seize PG&E assets by eminent domain. Time and time again, public opinion surveys reveal considerable public opposition to government seizing private property and businesses by eminent domain. Perhaps if SSJID is successful in taking PG&E property, the City of Manteca will feel obligated to hire the hundreds of displaced PG&E employees who have lost their jobs! Fair enough, right? Read the Lathrop Manteca Sun Post article by clicking here.

California Bullet Train Could Railroad Property Owners

September 30, 2009 - Yesterday, the California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) revealed its long awaited plans for the Bay Area train route. These plans spell big trouble for property owners that could be affected by proposed train paths. The San Mateo County Times reports that, “The expansion may result in taking of homes and businesses through eminent domain.” So far, Menlo Park and Atherton have sued the agency, fearing the power the CHSRA could have over their cities and their futures. The plan revealed yesterday will most likely be a starting point for this controversial project and all of its far reaching implications are yet to be seen, but the CHSRA has few options when it comes to obtaining the land it needs. It is already clear that eminent domain will most likely play center stage to the transformation of the bay area as these trains move in and it is important that a spotlight be kept on the CHSRA as they grow closer to finalizing these plans.

After Losing Bid, City of Sausalito Looks to Eminent Domain to Steal Property!

September 10, 2009 - The City of Sausalito is considering the use of eminent domain to acquire water front property after they lost out to a developer who offered a higher price for the land. In an editorial today, the Marin Independent Journal warns the city against using the highly controversial land acquisition technique saying, “Even after being outbid by a private investor, the city is still pursuing the property, including talking about acquiring it through the risky legal maneuver of eminent domain. Eminent domain is a powerful device that that also carries a sizable financial risk for taxpayers.” This threat puts Morgan at a major disadvantage with the city, should he need to come before the council or planning commission to build on the land. The paper is clear when it comes to property rights saying, “The city must be careful not to sacrifice fairness and respect for private property rights in its negotiations with Morgan. Council members should not let their real estate negotiations cloud a fair and open planning process.

Redevelopment Scheme Alive and Well

September 8, 2009 – As reported by Bee columnist Dan Walters, “(City of) Industry has hired a squad of well-connected lobbyists to pass the stadium measure and also promote its scheme to allow cities to extend soon-to-expire redevelopment projects in return for allowing the state to shift some redevelopment funds to the deficit-ridden state budget.” The scheme involves allowing the state to divert redevelopment funds to help balance the state budget and in return, the legislation will make it easier for local redevelopment agencies to seize homes and small businesses by eminent domain. It is no wonder California has some of the weakest private property rights laws on the books – and getting weaker if developers of a proposed football stadium get their way.  

Will South San Joaquin Irrigation District's Eminent Domain Plan Fleece Taxpayers?

September 4, 2009 – This week, the South San Joaquin Irrigation District’s (SSJID) board of directors voted once again to seize PG&E’s power lines by eminent domain, promising local ratepayers better rates and service. But can they deliver on this promise? There is no telling if they can and what consequences lay ahead for local ratepayers. A few years ago, the Local Agency Formation Committee (LAFCO) rejected SSJID’s application to seize PG&E assets and now, they intend to go before LAFCO with essentially the same application that was denied before! Moreover, should SSJID prevail in forcing PG&E to give up its assets by eminent domain, the law requires SSJID to pay “fair market value” for the property. SSJID claims the property is worth a mere $129 million, but at the hearing PG&E raised the point that the irrigation district never had access to its high value underground facilities and assets! Oops. The Stockton Record reported, ”PG&E's Emily Barnett said the district's estimate understated the cost of acquiring the utility giant's assets by eminent domain, which she said would exceed $400 million. She told the district's governing board to "learn from your past mistakes" and to forgo a campaign it already has spent millions of dollars waging.” If SSJID has under estimated the value of PG&E’s assets, then their promise of lower rates to local ratepayers will never be realized. Stay tuned… this battle will be brewing for months.

Bulldozing Developer Files for Bankruptcy!

September 4, 2009 – They say what goes around, comes around. That is certainly the case for a Baldwin Park developer who was scheming with city leaders to build a project that involved seizing over 500 homes and businesses by eminent domain. The Los Angeles Business Journal reports, “Real estate developer Bob Bisno, who last year failed in an attempt to build a large redevelopment project in Baldwin Park, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.” Fortunately for local residents, the developer pulled the plug on the project before the bulldozers began demolition and his bankruptcy means local residents are safe – for now!

Alliance Against AB 226 and AB 291

September 1, 2009 - This week, the Alliance has come out against AB 226 and AB 291. Both of these bills would expand the powers of the California Coastal Commission, which has already proved to have overreaching authority when it comes to private property rights.

“As we all know, times are tough in California, but allowing agencies to supplement their budgets by removing the essential oversight functions of the courts is wrong and would sell California property owners short,” said Marko Mlikotin, President of the Alliance. “California is already far behind other states in ensuring property rights protections, but AB 226 and 291 would go even farther in eroding those rights guaranteed in our Constitution.”

AB 226 will allow the Commission to become its own judicial branch of government, acting as both prosecutor and judge when imposing fines for indiscretions. No coastal property owner is safe, when the Coastal Commission is able to impose fines at will, with no due process for those Californians. AB 291 would allow Coastal Commission staff to deny permit applications without a hearing. This bill would allow staff to stop the processing of a permit application if they deem the property owner already has a violation on their land. There have been numerous times when commission staff has claimed a violation had taken place, when the Commissioners disagreed with their findings.

Tell your state representatives that enough is enough! Click here to find your legislators.

South San Joaquin County Irrigation District Desires PG&E’s Property

August 12, 2009 – As reported by the Manteca Bulletin, the South San Joaquin Irrigation District is making ready for its September 3rd board meeting at which they will vote to seize PG&E’s power lines and infrastructure by eminent domain. They clearly are not students of history. Several years ago, Sacramento Municipal Power District (SMUD) tried to seize PG&E’s assets in Yolo County too. Once all the facts were presented, consumers did not trust the promise of electrical savings and soundly rejected SMUD’s plan. Will history repeat itself in San Joaquin County? Stay tuned.

Public Television Program Shills for Redevelopment Agencies

August 2, 2009 – The LA Times reports how “The California Redevelopment Assn. and its partners have put up $320,000 to help Howser produce 14 episodes highlighting the achievements of redevelopment projects around the state, part of an attempt to convince Californians that they should care about this little-understood arm of government that receives and spends more than $5 billion a year in property taxes.”  The article truly exposes how public television can be exploited to  shape public opinion. Unfortunately, reporter Huell Howser did not profile the countless examples of redevelopment projects that involve demolishing  people’s homes and small businesses (livelihoods), only for developers to walk away from the projects.

How Did Budget Proposal Benefit Blight Barons?

August 2, 2009 – Steven Greenhut, of the Orange County Register writes of his great relief that a special interest provision in the recently approved state budget was removed. The provision would have made it easier for redevelopment agencies to seize private property and give it to developers. Greenhut writes, “And something even more wonderful took place in Sacramento last week: The budget package "takes" $1.7 billion away from the state's redevelopment agencies, and the Assembly refused to pass a piece of special interest legislation promoted by that giant redevelopment agency of a town, the city of Industry, that would have allowed cities to expand redevelopment zones for 40 years without conducting a blight finding. In an up economy, the state never would have grabbed the cash, and it would almost certainly have given the redevelopment agencies that extra latitude, which Industry wanted as an obvious means to pay for the infrastructure for a new NFL stadium proposed by the city's most influential developer.”

When California law allows property to be seized by eminent domain, even if it is next to blighted property (maybe even blocks away), private property rights throughout California were spared a direct assault by special interest groups.

Vallejo's Redevelopment Project a Flop?

July 26, 2009 – The Times-Herald reports that “Vallejo city leaders banked big dreams on a federal urban renewal project that promised a new era of prosperity.” Unfortunately, “A half-century later the city is still trying to realize that promise and unlock the waterfront’s and downtown’s potential.” You can just add Vallejo to a host of other California cities like San Francisco, Fresno, Baldwin Park, Garden Grove, San Diego and many others that used taxpayer dollars to seize private property by eminent domain to “revitalize” their communities. In many cases, after years of inertia and wasted tax dollars, such redevelopment projects are abandoned or never fully realized. Perhaps, a former Vallejo mayor said it best, “They tried but nothing ever happened.”  Vallejo is a frightening example when one considers that this failed redevelopment plan displaced over 500 families and dozens of businesses.

Vallejo is just another reason elected officials are calling for redevelopment reform and presenting market based alternatives to eminent domain that strengthen communities without infringing on private property rights. For those who wish to learn about a movement to reform redevelopment practices, read Simplify, Don't Subsidize by the Institute for Justice. It is a worthwhile read and a movement worthy of public support.

Transmission Line Plan Tanked

July 17, 2009 – The Transmission Agency of Northern California’s plan to build 600 miles of high voltage transmission lines over private property is dead, leading property owners throughout Northern California good reason to celebrate.  The center of the controversy included the agency’s power of eminent domain and this invoked considerable protest from neighbor groups from Modesto to as far north as Redding. Is the plan dead and if so, for how long ask property owners. The local utility companies are still under pressure to meet state mandated renewal energy standards and no “Plan B” has emerged to achieving this mandate without the recently tanked transmission line plan.  Stay tuned for developing news.  

Threatened Long Beach Property Owners Fight Back!

July 12, 2009 – In the Southern California community of Long Beach, a home can be deemed blighted if its garage is untidy. Yes, you read this correctly! As many of you know, a blight designation is a perquisite for government to condemn and seize your property by eminent domain. So, you can only imagine, in a community that has had over 40% of the landmass deemed “blighted,” the Long Beach Press Telegram reports  that homeowners are fighting back. In the article, the city defends its practices and claims that they have never seized a home by eminent domain. This may be true, but public agencies use the “threat” of eminent domain to achieve the same objective. Like a gun placed to a property owners head, government simple says take the offer for your home or else – and it works. Soon enough, even the last holdout sells when they see their neighbors move, homes boarded up, landscape deteriorate and crime grow. If the goal of the City of Long Beach is to improve the quality of life, why don’t they simply create an economic environment that stimulates job creation, fund neighborhood improvement programs and increase policing rather than seize people’s homes and livelihoods?  And here is another crazy thought…  how many Long Beach city council members had untidy garages when they extended the city’s eminent domain powers?   

Supreme Court Nominee: Enemy of Property Rights

July 11, 2009 – According to an adjunct scholar at the CATO Institute, “it is not easy for a judge to undermine property rights further than the Supreme Court did in 2005 in Kelo v. City of New London. Conn.” That is unless you are Judge Sotomayor. As we all know, the Kelo case was the landmarked decision that sanctioned government’s ability to profit by seizing private property from unwilling sellers and give it to a private developer. In 2006, Judge Sotomayor ruled against property owners in a case that involved a politically connected developer who tried to extort over $800,000 or a 50 percent stake in their proposed CVS pharmacy and in return, the developer would not urge the City of Port Chester, N.Y. to seize their property by eminent domain! Sotomayor’s panel ruled that even if the property owner’s account of the case was true, the city still had the right to seize their property because the developer’s project served a so-called “public benefit.” As Sotomayor’s confirmation hearings begin this week, will U.S. Senators fully explore Judge Sotomayor’s position on private property rights or will they ignore the need to protect our Nation’s Fifth Amendment? Stay tuned.  

Controversial Power Line Project Zapped?

July 7, 2009 – As reported in the Sacramento Bee, a controversial plan by the Transmission Agency of Northern California (TANC) to build over 600 miles of transmission lines by seizing private property by eminent domain lost one of its largest financial partners last week when the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) decided that the project “isn’t strong enough to justify spending additional money on scoping and planning.” Without this critical funding, a consortium of other municipal utility districts will have to pony up even more money for the project to pencil out. The massive power line project is needed for the consortium to meet a state mandate that requires their power portfolio to include a mix of renewal energy sources such as wind and solar. Critics say that alternatives to new power lines need to be explored. Regardless of what view people subscribe to, the property owners from Modesto to Redding who stand to lose their property to eminent domain celebrated the 4th of July and SMUD’s decision this past weekend.

A test for Prop. 99

June 23, 2009 - In June of 2008, Prop. 99, an eminent domain ballot measure financed by redevelopment agencies and other public agency organizations that profit by seizing private property, won voter approval.  While roundly criticized by the Alliance and legal experts for its many loopholes, a case in Lynwood may put the new law to the test. Developers have re-introduced a massive 44 acre hotel, auto mall and retail project that has one problem-there is no open space in this Los Angeles area community, just homes and small businesses! 

Local property owners fought a similar project by the same developer some years earlier when the proposed project included a NFL football stadium that would rest on top of hundreds of homes and small businesses, displacing about 1000 people. According to the Los Angeles WAVE newspaper, the developer has now moved the project to crush another neighborhood instead with presumably fewer “owner occupied” homes that are purported to be illegal seizures under Prop. 99.  We guess if you fail the first time, try… try again.

A Documentary Critical of the California Coastal
Commission Under Attack

June 17, 2009 - A filmmaker who is producing Sins of Commission, a movie critical of the California Coastal Commission’s infringement on private property rights, was served a subpoena by the commission to acquire raw footage of the film before its final release! Claiming that this intimidation is an attack on his 1st Amendment Rights, the filmmaker is going public.  This legal tactic comes as no surprise to property owners who have dealt with a commission who has denied them the ability to make even the most modest improvements to their homes -- or permission to trim dry brush around their property during fire season.  In fact, some believe that the Coastal Commission is using intimidation to suppress any criticism of the unelected commission that is accountable to no one! Perhaps, it will only be when the film is finally made public that California voters will understand the full scope and authority of this powerful, yet otherwise obscure State commission.  

• Click here to watch the NBC LA'S Coverage of the developing story
• Visit the Sins of Commission website to learn more

June 15, 2009 – Columnists compare the Transbay Joint Powers Authority’s use of eminent domain to legendary outlaw Black Bart.

• Read the San Francisco Chronicle article

June 14, 2009 – The NY Times reports, “Judge Sonia Sotomayor will doubtless be questioned about Kelo at her confirmation hearings next month. But her answers will be complicated by her participation in a 2006 decision applying and extending Kelo.”

• Read the New York Times article

June 8, 2009 - The Associated Press writes, “The federal government backtracked Friday and decided not to seize the western Pennsylvania property needed to build a Flight 93 (9-11) memorial, saying instead it would renew negotiations with landowners.”

• Read the Associated Press article

June 7, 2009 - Residents in upstate California who have had their property right’s threatened by the proposed high voltage power lines have started to fight back by forming the North State Land Owners Committee.

• Read the Redding Record Searchlight article

June 6, 2009 – A writer states in a San Francisco column that the President’s nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court; “Her record on property rights is no more promising. In 2006’s Didden v. Village of Port Chester, she ratified an eminent-domain abuse that makes the infamous Kelo case look mild.”

• Read the San Francisco Examiner column

June 4, 2009 – Caltrans is coming under increasing criticism for becoming one of the state’s biggest slumlords by acquiring property by eminent domain for roads never built and allowing them to deteriorate into blighted properties. Selling these properties to balance the state budget deficit is just one of many solutions according to a local state legislator.

• Read the Pasadena Weekly article

June 3, 2009 -- The citizens of the California High Desert are fighting back against the use of eminent domain to seize property to build obtrusive power lines.

• Read the Hi-Desert Star article

May 31, 2009 – The Orange County Register suggests reforming redevelopment to save the State budget $5 billion!

• Read the Orange County Register editorial

May 26, 2009 – A filmmaker takes on the California Coastal Commission in his recently released film, "Sins of Commission." To learn about the film and view testimonials from property owners fighting for their rights, visit www.sinsofcommission.com.

May 11, 2009 – Northern California property owners fighting plan to build major power lines through their property and communities.

• Read the Sacramento Bee article

May 7, 2009 – To build a 9/11 memorial in Pennsylvania, the Associated Press reports that the federal government intends to seize land by eminent domain so that “the Flight 93 memorial can be built by the 10th anniversary of the terrorist attacks, property owners say they're disappointed and surprised by the plan.”

• Read the Associated Press article

May 7, 2009 – The Sacramento Bee reports, “Property owners in five counties around the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta are protesting plans by the state to survey their land for a controversial new water canal – opposition that has landed them in court.”

• Read the Sacramento Bee article

May 5, 2009 – The Orange County Register reports that, “The Fullerton City Council is set to vote today on a noxious redevelopment plan that will undermine property rights, promote the use of eminent domain.”

• Read the Orange County Register editorial

May 4, 2009 – Stockton farmers threatened by eminent domain are taking the State to court. Case may be the first of many in the battle to fight the proposed Peripheral Canal.

• Read the Stockton Record Net article

May 1, 2009- Justice David Souter, who sided against against Susette Kelo and her pink house in one of the most controversial eminent domain cases, Kelo v. New London, is said to be retiring from the Supreme Court. Friends of property rights should breathe a sigh of relief!

• Read the Fox News article
• Read about Susette Kelo and her case

April 23, 2009 - The City of Fullerton intends to declare an area with over 160 businesses 'blighted,' which would leave them susceptible to eminent domain abuse.

• Read the Orange County Register editorial

March 14, 2009 – Forest City Enterprises, a developer who has preyed on private property rights throughout California and contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to defeat eminent domain ballot measures, pulls out of Fresno redevelopment project. Local property owners are spared eminent domain for now.

• Read the Fresno Bee article
• Watch the ABC Channel 30 News Clip

March 13, 2009 – Despite veto threats from Governor Barbour, the Mississippi State House overwhelmingly passed legislation that would severely limit the use of eminent domain. Unfortunately, eminent domain reform has not come to California.

• Read the Commercial Appeal article
• Write your California legislators today!

March 11, 2009 – March 11, 2009 – Assemblyman Hector De La Torre, opponent of eminent reform in California, has announced his intentions to run for Insurance Commissioner.

• Read the Sacramento Bee Capitol Alert

March 10, 2009 – In an unusual case in San Mateo County, one government agency is attempting to use eminent domain to acquire water wells from another government agency.  

• Read the San Mateo County Times article

March 5, 2009 – Since Lodi voters rejected a ballot measure that prompted fears of eminent domain, city leaders are now searching ways to improve their community without threatening private property rights.

• Read the Stockton Record Net article

March 4, 2009 – Voters soundly reject a measure that would broaden redevelopment plans in Lodi and prompted fears of eminent domain abuse.  

• Read the Lodi News-Sentinel aritcle

March 3, 2009 – In order to acquire new water, Oceanside is threatening to use eminent domain. Seizure puts property owner’s plans to build a hotel at risk!  

• Read the North County Times article

February 28, 2009 – Community group opposes city of Pittsburg's use of eminent domain for a redevelopment project.

• Read the Contra Costa Times article

February 18, 2009 – The Stockton Record reports, “The court ruled Friday that Stockton's acquisition of Marina Tower, on the north bank of the Stockton Deep Water Channel, was based on vague resolutions of necessity that failed to specify for what use the city sought the land. "This is a case of 'condemn first, decide what to do with the property later,' " the court ruled.”

• Read the Stockton Record Net article

February 11, 2009 -  City of San Jose may seek political retribution against business group for its efforts to unseat a pro-eminent domain councilmember.

• Read the San Jose Mercury News article

February 7, 2009 – Ontario homeowners raise eminent domain concerns and protest proposed plan to bulldoze their homes for industrial properties.

• Read the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin article

January 26, 2009 -  Read the Wall Street Journal’s book review of the “Little Pink House,” the story of Suzette Kelo’s battle to protect her New London Connecticut home from eminent domain – a battle that launched a national private property rights debate.

• Read the Wall Street Journal review

January 26, 2009 – The Los Angeles Times reports on Temple City and a case involving alleged campaign contributions, bribes and eminent domain.

• Read the Los Angeles Times article

January 22, 2009 – In a victory for property rights, the Institute for Justice wins an appeal case that reverses a decision to throw out an eminent domain case brought by a Youth Athletic Club that would hold the city accountable for its redevelopment plans.

• Read the San Diego Union Tribune article

January 17, 2009 - The Institute for Justice takes on a Southern California city that has unrightfully declared 700 properties blighted, including a youth athletic center.

• Read the San Diego Union Tribune article

January 9, 2009 - Sadly, Dudley Holman, a founding director of the Alliance, has passed away.  He was a good friend and champion of private property rights, and other noble causes in his community. Dudley helped establish the Alliance when the Yolo County Board of Supervisors sought to seize a 17,000 acre ranch by eminent domain, using profits from a local casino to pay for it! Everyone who came to know Dudley as a friend, community leader and a champion of private property rights will miss him dearly.

• Learn more

January 6, 2009 – The Azusa City Council votes unanimously to seize a family business by eminent domain for a restaurant and grocery store. The business is not “blighted.” It just stands in the way of another business that promises more tax revenue!

• Read the San Gabriel Valley Tribune Article

January 6, 2009 - Never before has a budget proposal put California private property rights at such risk. California already has some of the weakest private property laws in the Nation. Under current law, a modest home or productive business can be deem blighted and subjected to eminent domain even if it is just next to so-called "blighted" property. As Dan Walters points out, in return for diverting redevelopment funds to the State of California, these very agencies can redesignate properties "blighted" without any new blight studies! This budget plan will only give public agencies financial incentives to gobble up private property from unwilling sellers to satisfy government's insatiable need for new tax revenue!

• Read Dan Walter's Column in the Sacramento Bee

December 29, 2008 – Eminent Domain/Water Rights: The Conaway Ranch, once threatened by eminent domain, is being sued by environmental groups for selling its surplus water.

• Read the Sacramento Bee Article

December 21, 2008 – The Orange County Register editorializes on the ills of redevelopment.

• Read the Orange County Register Editorial

December 7, 2008 – Victorville residents say city’s “land grab” ruined them.

• Read the Victorville Daily Press Article

December 5, 2008 – Azusa furniture store owner begins petition drive to save his business from eminent domain.

• Read the San Gabriel Valley Tribune Article

December 2, 2008 - The fight to protect Baldwin Park from eminent domain abuse is over. The developer’s business has collapsed and he even had to sell his home!

• Read the San Gabriel Valley Tribune Article

November 26, 2008 – Only after a ranch and modest homes are seized by eminent domain and bulldozed does the developer pull the plug on the project. Yet another promise of revitalization at the expense of property rights fails!

• Read Riverside Press-Enterprise Article

November 25, 2008 – Illustrating that property owners are never truly compensated when their property is seized by eminent domain, a developer is suing a public agency for NOT using eminent domain to acquire property on the cheap. While it cost them more, the agency chose to do the right thing. They entered into a willing agreement with the property owner.

• Read Stockton Record Net Article

November 24, 2008 – Efforts to use eminent domain to build an NFL team in Los Angeles is not dead! How can a stadium be built when homes and businesses stand in the way?

• Read Torrance Daily Breeze Article

November 21, 2008 - Today, property owners in Baldwin Park are celebrating! For the past two years, the City of Baldwin Park was working with a controversial developer to seize over 200 homes and 300 businesses by eminent domain - an area of over 125 football fields! This week, the developer backed out of the deal!

• Read San Gabriel Valley Tribune Article
• View Past Baldwin Park You Tube Videos  

November 16, 2008 – Only weeks after the City of Sacramento acquires private property under the threat of eminent domain does the city’s chosen developer seek even more taxpayer dollars to subsidize the project. The property owner gets pennies on the dollar for his property and now taxpayers get fleeced!  What’s next?

• Read Sacramento Bee article

November 13, 2008 – Former residents (over 1000 families) of Chavez Ravine share painful memories of being tossed from their homes for Dodger Stadium and never being fully compensated for their lost property.

• Read LA Daily News article

November 12, 2008 – South San Joaquin Irrigation District lobbies business group to stay neutral on their efforts to seize PG&E property by eminent domain.

See related articles:

• Thaw in SSJID and Chamber relationship?
  -Manteca Bulletin, 11/9/08
  
  
• Chamber leaders promise neutral stance on SSJID, PG&E struggle
  -Manteca Bulletin, 11/12/08
  

November 9, 2008 – Read how San Francisco’s “Harlem of the West” lost over 900 businesses and 4,700 homes to eminent domain and little to show for it!  As the city takes on redeveloping San Francisco’s last remain black neighborhoods, have they not learned from their mistakes?

• Read about it in the San Francisco Examiner

October 31, 2008 - The Long Beach Press Telegram says, “Residents of North Long Beach, worried that some of their homes might be condemned for redevelopment projects, are giving City Hall a tough time. Rightfully so.”

• Read the Editorial

October 28, 2008 – Long Beach pack rats beware! City of Long Beach considers homes blighted if you can’t fit your car in your garage. Organization that litigated the Kelo case before the U.S. Supreme Court finds this "bizarre and offensive."

• Read the Long Beach Press-Telegram Article

October 21, 2008 – As columnist Dan Walters reports, redevelopment projects that are intended to revitalize communities can backfire.

• Read Dan Walter's Column
  

October 17, 2008 – Threatened by eminent domain, historic Long Beach bookstore closes its doors after nearly 75 years of business.

• Long Beach Press-Telegram Article

October 14, 2008 - The Alliance announces their endorsements of property right advocates in key races across California.

• Press Release

October 8, 2008 –Prop. 99 proves to be a sham! Yesterday, the City of Long Beach voted to extend eminent domain powers to its redevelopment agency in accordance with Prop. 99, or so they say. Redevelopment interests that drafted and financed Prop. 99 claimed throughout their campaign that their measure provided “iron-clad” protections for homeowners. However, the City has found several loopholes, including one that allows them to seize homes if the homeowner does not comply with “maintenance standards,” including having a untidy garage. Pack rats beware of eminent domain!

• Castle Coalition Blog
• Long Beach Press-Telegram Article
• City Document
• Independent Analysis of Prop. 99
• Independent Analysis of Prop. 99

September 30, 2008 - Governor Schwarzenegger vetoes AB 2686. The bill would have allowed tribes, sovereign nations, to join joint powers authorities that have the power of eminent domain. In 2005, a Yolo County tribe sought to use their vast financial resources to fund an eminent domain taking of Conaway Ranch -- over 17,000 acres farmland and its water rights.

• Read the Capitol Weekly article
  

September 24, 2008 - The City of Vista doubles the size of its redevelopment area with no written assurances that private property won’t be seized by eminent domain.

• Read the North County Times article

September 21, 2008 – Property owners in Yorba Linda qualify a eminent domain reform measure that will appear on the November ballot.

• Read the Orange County Register Op-Ed

September 20, 2008 - Despite assurances by the Vista redevelopment agency that they won't seize homes by eminent domain, the city fuels community distrust by refusing to put it writing!

• Read the North County Times article

September 17, 2008 - The Long Beach Press Telegram narrows in on Proposition 99’s blatant flaws and explains why property owners have a right to be uneasy with government taking of private property.

• Read the Long Beach Press Telegram editorial

September 16, 2008 - Despite opposition from residents, Long Beach extends power of eminent domain to seize private property.

• Read the Long Beach Press Telegram article

September 15, 2008 - Yet another national public opinion survey reveals that Americans overwhelming oppose the seizing of private property by eminent domain for economic development purposes. 88% of Americans feel that private property rights is a fundamental right.

• Read the Survey
• Read the Contra Costa Times article

September 11, 2008 - A local citizen discovers firsthand how a citizens committee designed to advise a city on a redevelopment project was rigged to undermine private property rights.

• Read the Santa Ynez Valley Journal article

September 2, 2008 - Redevelopment agencies that have acquired considerable wealth by seizing private property on the cheap now stand to lose funds to balance the state budget. All the property owners who have lost their property to eminent domain are not shedding any tears for them.

• Read Dan Walter's column

August 29, 2008 - An Atascadero paper reports, "Pat and Sue Gaughn, the Atascadero property owners who sued the city of Atascadero in 2006 claiming ingenuine threats of eminent domain damaged them in excess of $200,000, reached a settlement with the city's self-insurance pool last week." This case illustrates how public agencies use the threat of eminent domain to force people from their property!

• Read the Atascadero News article

August 28, 2008 - Under pressure from local residents, Baldwin Park appears to have modified its ambitious plan by limiting their abusive takings of private property to small business properties only. Unfortunately, this came too late for 40 homeowners and will do nothing for over 300 small business owners like Ken Woods whose family business will face  eminent domain and the bull dozer for the second time!

• Read the San Gabriel Valley Tribune article

August 25, 2008 - The LA Business Journal reports on how a group that tried to swindle the state of millions of dollars is to acquire a shopping center project by eminent domain. It pays to be politically connected in LA!

• Read the Los Angeles Business Journal article

August 23, 2008 - Reece Eptein, with Project 21 black leadership network, writes, "Self-professed champions of the poor don't help when they oppose eminent domain reform."

• Read the Washington Times Op-ed

August 18, 2008 - In July, the Los Angeles Times reported that a politically connected developer boasted of its relationship with the LA redevelopment agency and lucrative returns on properties, some of which were seized by eminent domain. On Friday, the LA City Council approved a redevelopment agency plan to build a shopping center on property seized by eminent domain, too. Here is the catch. It involves a public subsidy of over $20 million! The rightful owners of the property had plans to build a shopping center, too, but with no public assistance. Why is the city wasting taxpayer dollars? Is it because the plan involves conveying the property to a politically non-profit that tried to swindle the State of over $1.3 million for a soccer field never built?

• Read the Press Release
• Read the Los Angeles Times article on the controversial non-profit
• Read the Los Angeles Times article on the developer
• Watch the KNBC story

August 14, 2008 - Over 1000 families are threatened by eminent domain in Los Angeles. How can this be since supporters of Prop. 99 say homes are forever protected from eminent domain abuse?

• Read the Los Angeles Wave Article

August 13, 2008 - The South San Joaquin Irrigation District continues to position itself financially to acquire PG&E by eminent domain.

• Read the Manteca Bulletin Article

August 13, 2008 - Does eminent domain benefit poor neighborhoods in South Los Angeles?

• Read the Los Angeles Times Article

August 10, 2008 - The City of Azusa abandons its redevelopment project only after seizing and demolishing productive businesses by eminent domain! Yet another example of the risks associated with seizing private property and giving it to development interests.

• Read the San Gabriel Valley Tribune Article

July 27, 2008 - The Orange County Register writes, "So it's with enormous disappointment that we learn that Mr. Howser has agreed to host a 14-segment series paid for by the California Redevelopment Association--the folks who advocate the use of eminent domain on behalf of 'economic development'"...

• Read the Orange County Register Editorial

July 23, 2008 - Action Alert: The California Redevelopment Association (CRA) has bought off renowned TV host of California Gold (Public TV) Huell Howser to do a puff piece on redevelopment, without highlighting how public agencies have used eminent domain to destroy historic business districts, homes and livelihoods. While CRA is a sponsor of this segment, the program is aired on public television. Since this is your tax dollars at work, email Mr. Howser today and demand a balanced segment that tells the stories of enriched developers and victims.

• To learn more, read the Orange County Register's Orange Blog

July 22, 2008 - We told you so! Even after Prop. 99 becomes law, Baldwin Park is seizing 100 homes and so is the City of Vista.

• Read our Press Release

July 21, 2008 -The San Francisco Chronicle reports, "The San Francisco Redevelopment Agency will leave the Western Addition in January, ending a 40-year 'urban renewal' project that was touted as a move to wipe out blight but actually destroyed the city's most prominent African American neighborhood."

• Read the San Francisco Chronicle Article

July 21, 2008 – The idea of having redevelopment agencies bailout the state budget deficit in return for relaxing eminent domain laws is alive and well.

• Read the San Diego Union-Tribune Article
• Read the Related Sacramento Bee Article

July 20, 2008 – Politically connected lobbying firm boasts of huge returns on LA redevelopment projects. Bob Blue, a private property activist, raises concerns.

• Read the Los Angeles Times Article

July 18, 2008 - City of Vista is yet another city that seeks to exploit a Prop. 99 loophole that exempts redevelopment zones from purported home protections. Shame on proponents of Prop. 99 for tricking voters!

• Read the San Diego Union-Tribune Article

July 13, 2008 - The great debate of who is responsible for "blighted" communities, a requisite for using eminent domain, rages in Stockton. Local columnist says city is responsible!

• Read the Stockton Record Article

July 12, 2008 - City files suit to remove two-story-high "End Eminent Domain Abuse" mural in St. Louis!

• Read the Los Angeles Times Article

July 8, 2008 - What has been developed on Suzette Kelo's property, the case that led to the U.S. Supreme Court's controversial Kelo v. New London decision? Nothing! The property was seized for a development project never built!

• View the Fox Story

July 8, 2008 - The City of Baldwin Park is looking for ways to exploit Prop. 99's loopholes so that they can seize over 200 homes! Have they no shame?

• Read the San Gabriel Valley Tribune Article

July 8, 2008 – In return for relaxing the blight designations that are required to seize private property from unwilling sellers, the League of CA Cities and redevelopment interests have come up with a scheme to help bail out the state’s budget deficit! Making it easier to seize private property by eminent domain is not an acceptable solution to balancing state budgets!

• Read Budget Scheme

ACTION ITEM: Call your legislators today and urge them to reject the League’s scheme.

July 5, 2008 - More than 20 years ago, the City of Indio used eminent domain to demolish homes for retail projects never built. Locals are now weary of plans to use the vacant property to save a mall that is going out of business!

• Read the Desert Sun Article

June 26, 2008 - Temple City small business owners believe the city's business moratorium is designed to purposely create blight so that business property can be seized by eminent domain.

• Read the Pasadena Star News Article

June 26, 2008 - Jon Coupal, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association President, reflects on the passing of the Kelo decision's 3rd anniversary and how California still needs reforms.

• Read the California Republic Article

June 22, 2008 - Baldwin Park property owners seek to recall council members for eminent domain abuse.

• Read the San Gabriel Valley Tribune Article

June 21, 2008 - Home that ignited national property rights rebellion is relocated to a new location.

• Read the Los Angeles Times Article

June 19, 2008 - Recognizing Prop. 99's shortcomings, Redding City Council passes Prop. 98 like protections.

• Read the Record Searchlight Article

June 19, 2008 - See how Proposition 99's weaknesses and loopholes won't help the citizens in San Bernardino who are now under the threat of eminent domain.

• Read the Press-Enterpise Article

June 17, 2008 - A rising trend in local utilities using eminent domain to take private water systems away from businesses and hand them over to government interests.

• Read the Wall Street Journal Article

June 13, 2008 - Public agency that funneled money into campaigns opposed to eminent domain reform, rubber stamps millions worth in tax-free bonds. Calls increase for greater oversight.

• Read the Orange County Register Article

June 12, 2008 - The Sacramento Union reports, "If you voted for Proposition 99 last week, there is an unsettling possibility that you were conned."

• Read the Sacramento Union Article

June 11, 2008- Pittsburg Redevelopment Agency threatens waterfront business with eminent domain. They even want the owner to pay for cleanup of his property should they acquire it!

• Read the Contra Costa Times Article

June 8, 2008 - Two more papers have come to the conclusion that Prop. 99 will not protect all Californians from eminent domain abuse and that more reforms need to be passed.

• Read the Contra Costa Times Editorial
• Read the Los Angeles Times Editorial

June 7, 2008 - No more than 2 days after voters passed Prop. 99 the Seaside City Council extends eminent domain authority.

• Read the Article

June 6, 2008 - Public agency views passage of Prop. 99 as an invitation to seize PG&E's property by eminent domain.

• Read the Article

June 5 - More than 200 homes and businesses in Baldwin Park are being threatened by eminent domain and city leaders are unsure if Prop. 99 will stop the city from their redevelopment plans.

• Read the Article

June 5 - Throughout the campaign, proponents of Prop. 99 claimed that they would pursue additional reforms to fill in Prop. 99's loopholes. However, just days after the Prop. 99's passage they are backtracking on these promises.

• Read the San Diego Union-Tribune Editorial
• Read the Article

June 4 - Property rights advocates vow to continue the fight despite the loss of Prop. 98 at the polls.

• Read the Release
• Read the Capital Press Article
• Read the North County Times Article
• Read the Oakland Tribune Article